9910 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Exactly, a 1200 player online is a lot worse than a 1200 blitz.
They probably even play worse moves despite the relative time controls, so it just gives you longer to play at a similar or worse standard.
Did everyone start off much, much better than I am right now? I can't believe I'm so bad. Where are all the players who haven't already spent thousands of hours on the game?
I assure you you're nothing special when it comes to horrible beginnings. When I first started on this site around 6 or 7 months ago, i got thrashed and ripped apart every game, i ended up settling at some ungodly three digit rating for months, but sitting around feeling sorry for myself didn't do anything, go over your games, see where you went wrong, and make a concerned effort to not make the same mistake twice in a row, just to start off. Oh and the most important thing, until you get to around 1300-1500, do not resign at all, seriously, I've played people around my level who didn't know basic king and pawn endings, even if you know you are completely lost, at least you will start to see how to convert winning positions into won games, and keep playing
everyone lost their first 20 games of chess on chess.com, but i think almost everyobody (that hasn't already quit) started of better than you, you try to lose which makes you a loser (literly) we all try to win againsst better players and to improve at chess not get worse at it.
You seem to be very unhappy about losing so many games, which is understandable, but what is your strategy for improving? As far as I can tell, your strategy is to keep playing as many games as possible in the hopes that you will somehow improve.
I am not a very good player and I have lost a lot of games, but I am actually a better player than I was a few years ago. I started reading up on strategy, opening theory and general principles. I don't play any live chess shorter than 30 minutes and I don't make moves without at least a few seconds of thought.
You don't need to memorize thousands of opening lines but you do need to have some idea of why you are making the moves that you are. You tend to play the same opening for White that I do (e4, Nf3, Bc4) but do you know why you are making those moves? Could you explain to me your reasoning behind those moves?
There is a plethora of (free!) information out there that can help you to improve. All you have to do is accept that it will take some time and some effort.
Stupaud makes a lot of good points! When I began playing chess I had the attitude that I should try to figure everything out myself without studying books and other resources. I felt this way because I wanted to prove to myself that I was naturally a great chess player. After only a few weeks I realized how flawed this thought process was. Very few chess players are able to teach themselves how to play just by thinking about the game without any outside help (I would imagine only true prodigies can do this, the same people that go on to be in the top .001 percent of chess players).
The best way to improve is to play lots of games and find a good source that teaches basic chess strategies. Yasser Seirawan has a great book called "Playing Winning Chess" which is full of great strategic and tactical advice for someone starting to study chess.
I felt the same way you did when starting, but after reading a few books, studying tactics, and playing lots of games, my rating started to improve :)
You don't need the books. There's lots of free stuff on the net.
Seriously, playing against a computer is not a waste of time. Footballers, fighters, swimmers, skiers all spend a lot of time practising without competing. And it doesn't feel so bad to lose. Even Kasparov got beaten once or twice
Is that what you think?
IMO online players who have huge ratings compared to regular play are likely to be using computers to get their moves, or, at least checking their moves using a computer before making them (which is not actually cheating, but how can you call it fair play)
If that is what they are doing then it's cheating, plain and simple.
My opening are sending pieces out to control the center of the board, and defend the pieces out there. I didn't know why I was doing these openings at first, but I've read up on tactics.
It doesn't feel too bad losing sometimes, even 3/4 times, but every single time is just too much.
Do you want to play some online 1-day games with me? We can talk about your moves and your thinking behind them.
It doesn't have to be with me of course, but I think you need to give the live chess a rest for a while and play some slow games (1-3 days) with people who will give you feedback on your moves.
What is your opinion based on? If you go to http://www.chess.com/echess/players you can see that the average online rating is about 200 points higher than the average live rating. If you take a game from live standard where the players are rated ~1200 and compare it to an online game where the players are rated ~1200, you will see way more blunders in the online game.
I keep seeing advice like "learn openings" or "learn pawn structure." What? If you learn the rules, and how the pieces move, that should put you in the 1000s range. If you learn basic tactics, that should put you in the 1200s range.
NOPENOPENOPE. I am sure that I know the rules. Or is it just me?
Especially for blitz ratings, that doesn't seem right. Just knowing the rules doesn't mean you'll be 1000 right away. And while some people below 1000 make seemingly random or bizarre moves, some of them actually open the game reasonably and know some tactics.
completely disagreed !
When I started here, my online rating dropped into the 900's, though I knew the rules. I just made too many stupid mistakes. With some basic tactics and a little practice I'm into the 1200's. In blitz & bullet, the time pressure really changes the situation for an inexperienced player.
I just started with a rank of around 1200, and even at 600 after getting destroyed quickly 10 times, I'm getting annihilated. Is there a way to put my rank in a proper place so I get fair matches?
You lowered your rank by just asking this question.
In blitz, I suppose that doesn't apply. I have only ever played online, and that's what I refer to here, and perhaps I've simply had a different experience than others, but I genuinely don't ever remember being below 1000. And I learned the rules recently enough to remember.
Do you think the Budapest Gambit is better than the Sicilian for club level?
by mashanator 6 minutes ago
Why did you choose the username you have?
by Bullwhip99 6 minutes ago
French Players: Learn to embrace the Exchange Variation!
by WittyBlunder 6 minutes ago
8/1/2014 - Cserna-Pogats 1986
by WittyBlunder 8 minutes ago
July 2014 - Juggle with the minors
by MSC157 13 minutes ago
Nakamura, The Future World CHamp??
by Superqueen500 13 minutes ago
by alekspachalov99 18 minutes ago
Is evaluation objective?
by Elubas 38 minutes ago
Is it legal or not for sites to have....
by mrhjornevik 42 minutes ago
Blunder cost me the game.
by Abyl 56 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!