10223 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I just played a game with an opponent and afterwards, as I often do, I went to his/her profile to see if I could learn more about them. What I found in their games history was odd. I wonder if I should be suspicious of this member.
Here's the deal. In their games history it shows them playing another member with exactly the same name as theirs except that the user name ends in a "2" instead of a "1". The number 1 member says they were born in 1997 and the number 2 player says they were born in 1970. So they could be father and son/mother and daughter, but the birth date for number 2 is sort of suspicious too: January 1st 1970.
Number 1 has a rating on Standard Live Chess of just under 1200 and number 2 has a rating on same of 1316. Oh, and when they play they play unrated games. So their ratings stay the same.
Anyway, I had never seen this before I just have been wondering about it. Any reason to be suspicious or not?
what are you suspicious of? theyre playing unrated so its not like theyre boosting their rating or anything.Also, if birth dates on chess com are anything to consider, i doubt a 7 year difference would be enough to be a father/son mother/daughter thing, or at least i hope not.Probably two friends/siblings.
27 year difference; i.e. 1997 - 1970 = 27. Yes I was suspicious of boosting their rating, but of course playing unrated refutes that. But maybe concealing their rating? I don't know. I thought it was strange but I am relatively new here. Maybe this kind of thing is par for the course?
As long as it's two people playing against each other, I don't see a problem with it.
People playing each other from the same location (as would happen, e.g., with family members) are supposed to play unrated games only.
Nothing suspicious there...
Probably father-son/mother-daughter/mom-and-son/dad-daughter/everything except uncle and nephew.
7/23/2014 - Kasparov - Vilaisarn (simul) 2008
by 13SECTOR a few minutes ago
Complaint about my comments on Tactical Trainer
by valymer 4 minutes ago
YOU TUBE CHANEL
by brigatine-66 16 minutes ago
Ponziani: Impractical in non-computer Correspondence Chess?
by ponz111 17 minutes ago
CHESS SOFTWARE...which one?
by wiscmike 30 minutes ago
by BorgQueen 31 minutes ago
Paul Morphy Screenplay
by Angeloclimber 43 minutes ago
Fast tournament with lots of games at once - Everyone is eligible
by jurassicmark 50 minutes ago
Time Control Changes?
by AnishBhargava 57 minutes ago
Mate in 7
by davood_jfr 65 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!