Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Cheaters


  • 6 years ago · #61

    mr_obnauseous

    I take it as a compliment; 2 versus 1.  The opponent thinks so highly of you that he has to resort to another source. 

  • 6 years ago · #62

    AlecKeen

    Sothilde wrote:

    What I have been wondering about:

    In football (or soccer for you USA folks ;)), if you shoot at the goal (but would have missed), and just at that moment a bird flies by and hits the ball, thus causing it to bounce in the goal, would it count?


     Yes it would.

  • 6 years ago · #63

    JG27Pyth

    timmaylivinalie wrote: i don't enjoy losing persay it just happened to be the way to reach my goal of getting a zero rating. i am a competitive person i just chose a different path on this site. i was in a race to zero with a couple others - bongcloud and polgar0..bongcloud gave up when he saw he had no chance of catching me and polgar0 couldn't take the heat so i made him get the hell out the kitchen. the point i'm trying to make is that blood tastes like pennies.


     I want a timmay t-shirt or souvenir mug or maybe a timmay lanyard. Go Timmay! Also, it does taste like pennies, that's so true. There's people who don't understand timmay, and then there's people like me who don't understand either. Together we make a community.

    Awkward hug time!

  • 6 years ago · #64

    robert63

    yawn yawn. The 2 big topics resign resign! cheat cheat!

    Ever decreasing circles.

  • 6 years ago · #65

    Elubas

    I doubt there are many that cheat because cheating at chess can't be any fun.

  • 6 years ago · #66

    pnwoods

    I'm inclined to surmise those who've relied on this game, in OTB play, to put food in their bellies, hold cheaters in scathing contempt. & would cheerfully impart those sentiments if presented the opportunity. 

    OTB = Over the Board. = face to face. That would roughly equate to pre-internet.

  • 6 years ago · #67

    alec94x

    It's all a very big ego and power trip their bubble bursts when they are caught and rediscover the force of gravity when their rating is deleted.

  • 6 years ago · #70

    Magryx

    One question about cheating : Is using a magnetic chessboard to branch out your moves considered cheating?

    =/

  • 6 years ago · #71

    Olimar

    haha magnets are banned!

  • 6 years ago · #73

    Head_Hunter

    I no longer accept challenges for rated games from players below 1800, or players who have played 10 or fewer games. I've been burned.

    I don't really put a whole lot of value on any player's rating; I think experience is the best place to start when trying to study a prospective opponent. Thus, in the past I've tried to play matches with players of various ratings, and I had no problems with this when my own rating was below 1800. But when my rating moved beyond 1800, I began to get more challenges from lower rated players. The vast majority of these challenges came from players who just wanted to play a good game and perhaps learn something (and teach) along the way. But I'm sure that I've had a couple of them use chess engines to make their moves for them. If any of those cheaters (or any cheaters) are reading this, then this is for you:

    It is so unnecessary to do such things on this site. There's GAME EXPLORER which can, if used correctly, carry you at least ten moves against any player. You also have the ability to look at your opponent's past games. It not so important to study how your prospective opponent won the games that he or she won, but how his or her opponents LOST. This alone can carry you about 20 moves with most players.

  • 6 years ago · #74

    nlsnbebang

    you can't cheat neither use a chess program in a one minute game.

  • 6 years ago · #75

    AndreaCoda

    nlsnbebang wrote:

    you can't cheat neither use a chess program in a one minute game.


    But you can't neither "play chess" in one minute... Wink

  • 6 years ago · #76

    exigentsky

    timmaylivinalie wrote:
    this topic has been discussed at length many times so interest may be waning. my advice to you is not to care what brain ur opponent is using since it doesn't really matter. play the game to the best of ur ability and if you lose then try checkers or connect four or sumpthin :P

    I disagree, we need to be vigilent against cheaters lest we want it to become the norm and to drive honest players out of this and other online websites. Cheating should not be tolerated as it creates an atmosphere of distrust, steals what rightfully belongs to others, denigrates as well as devalues the accomplishments of honest playeres and hurts the game as a whole. Just because there are only a few immoral and pathetic scumbags that engage in it does not mean they should be let off the hook. If it were possible, heavy fines should be imposed on cheaters.

  • 6 years ago · #77

    redlite462

    ya know, if ya play as badly as I do (abt 1250) ya don't have to worry about cheaters Embarassed

  • 6 years ago · #78

    exigentsky

    SteveM wrote:
    I agree...but the best thing is to understand that this isn't the norm, and it's best to let it go if you think someone is bending the rules.  The argument (and burden of proof) isn't worth the hassle.

    I went back to read the rest of the thread and came upon this.

    This is exactly the kind of attitude that hurts online chess. We should never tolerate cheaters unless we want them to become the norm and destroy online chess.

    BTW: Yes, cheating is possible at any time control online - even 1 0. It just requires the cheaters to make a fully automated program. Read more here: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Realm/8655/ENGLISH/Main_ENG.htm#Top

  • 6 years ago · #79

    csharpe

    Ultimately, the true test of ability is at the board live with someone at about your rating.  If you have fairly earned your rating, then you will be where you should be; cheaters will be smoked out for who they really are soon enough.  I don't worry about it at all. 


Back to Top
This forum topic has been locked.