11770 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
In a recent live game, my opponent went with perpetual checks to wind down the clock, knowing I would be ahead. Now, I have played a few live chess games, and, this has never happened in any of my games previously. It appears that if your time runs out, even if your opponent has 1 second left on the clock, but no pieces, he/she wins.
So, what is the sense of assigning a point value to the pieces? I lost on time, but, I was up about 9 points. This was a 15 minute game, and my opponent was at 24 seconds when I ran out of time-and lost. The 9 point differential is because I had a Q and he had pawns-he had no chance of winning if it weren't for the clock. It was a sure win for me.
I love chess. But, in instances like this, I'm dismayed that one can "game" the system to their advantage.
Instead of replying that I should have moved more quickly, or, not put myself in a position to be checked perpetually, I would like an explanation on the point value of the pieces, and how it is relevant compared to time.
The actual rule is if the player with time left has mating material, to include B+N or greater, or stupidly, even RP and K vs. K on the Queening square, that player wins, otherwise a draw. For example, if your time falls and your opponent has a lone Bishop, the game should be a draw. Two Knights would be a draw, as I understand it.
To put it in perspective, your opponent could have a Pawn on the 2nd rank with your King blockading it on the third, and you could have four Queens and lose on time. Yeah, I know it's silly, but that's FIDE and USCF rules. Conversely, your opponent could promote all his Pawns to a dark-squared Bishops and draw with 9 of them because there is no possible mate.
It's not point-based, it conforms to the international chess federation standard rules. As far as what you can do, you have this knowledge now, and that's the best I can advise you.
To further explain, the "point" value is for your use as an evaluation tool for your position. It doesn't come into play at all in any of the FIDE or USCF rules. For example, you know that trading a Queen for two Rooks is to your advantage in most cases because the Rooks are 5 points and the Queen is 8 or 9, depending on what you have learned (assuming the Rooks are active), and you know that the beginner trade of the Bishop and Knight on f7 for the R and P is strategically bad. That is the purpose of point values of pieces.
Calling all Juniors U18! Signups for Junior International Cup 2016 is now open!
by aussiedj a few minutes ago
Depth Length Setting for Analyzing Games
by cavelorum 3 minutes ago
Why does nobody play 1. c3?
by DrSpudnik 4 minutes ago
Are tactics really the way to go?
by ponz111 12 minutes ago
What's the best way to become a chess prodigy as an adult?
by kleelof 15 minutes ago
Who taught you chess? When did you first start playing?
by kevinsong2003 16 minutes ago
5/28/2015 - Mate in 3
by billevans75 20 minutes ago
by lovethetrees 22 minutes ago
Why is Stockfish making this obviously bad move?
by Trapper4 26 minutes ago
Help to identify this chess set
by sudden090 31 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!