13472 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Hi everyone, long time reader, first time poster. Im at a moderate to beginner level, 1500 standard, 1340 blitz, 1100 bullet.
i was listening to coach dan heisman, and he said that he encouraged people to play 2-3 slow games a week to keep sharp. and he said people who play 1 game a week can still maintain their skills.
the problem, and i guess the question is: i play literally a hundred games a week, blitz and bullet, a few half hour time control games, but i dont know if all this playing makes me better... i just love the game, i love playing.
do you find that just playing games has ever made you better, or do you find you have to take a step back and only improve through exercises and reading?
Never play bullet if you want to get better. It's a game entirely different from chess that fools your mind into thinking it's chess, so unlike other non-chess games, it will compromise your long games in chess.
Bobby Fischer had some unnice things to say about blitz chess (ie 5 min games in particular not necessarily bullet chess specifically) although he won a super-strong 5 min tnmt 2 full pts ahead of the 2nd-place winner, Tal.
Overall I agree with kenpo - and wafflemaster, even though I prefer French Toast!
Have to ask yourself if you play chess to have fun, or if you want to move improvement to the top of your priorities.
Improvement and fun aren't mutually exclusive, but hundreds of blitz games a week (with no serious study and practice) are
what about even the longer time controls on the site?
do you think a 30 min time control is enough to think about all your moves and start to improve the way you see the board?
30 minutes is sufficient time. It won't screw you up.
I suggest training more than playing. If you do MANY tactics you'll get better to recognize opportunity... so in blitz, play your repertory (short one) and jump on opportunity... stop when you feel tired 'cause overdose won't serve you. Have fun !
Why not ask Caruana, Nakamura, Carlsen, Vachier-Lagrave....
These guys are trying to win the world championship. Do you really think they would play THOUSANDS of bullet games if they thought it would hurt their chances to win the one title that matters to them?
I love lightning; in fact, I got to the point where I play it exclusively. I agree with the comment that it is a different game in a sense - and, to me, that is not a bad thing whatsoever.Play what you find fun and pick the style that suits you most. I wouldn't even play anymore if it weren't for lightning.
Right. I've always despised bullet and blitz chess.
by RSK_Asherz 10 minutes ago
9/4/2015 - Just In Time
by lal_badam 14 minutes ago
Survive of any chess piece
by notmtwain 15 minutes ago
by ChessPatzer987 23 minutes ago
I have been MUTED because I mentioned putin
by baddogno 25 minutes ago
Simple Puzzle: 3 Mate Variations
by hsna 30 minutes ago
The time of my opponent never ends
by baddogno 36 minutes ago
History of the most popular cheap plastic set
by Drawgood 36 minutes ago
Analyzing and Solving Grunfeld variations
by Earth64 38 minutes ago
Uninvited match in online game
by RSK_Asherz 41 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!