6023 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
DanielleSurferGirl
It would be nice in live chess if you could move your mouse over someones name, and you could see the percentage of abandoned games they have (like "350 games 33% abandoned). This way you could avoid the few players who abandon their games constantly, and it might even discourage them from doing so if their abandoned stats were publicly shown.
kingkoy301
I think that's a nice one.
piotr
Yes, we are going to implement something like this. Thanks!
erniepear
This seems to happen quite often in online chess-- though I suppose if your computer crashes you might lose on time. There must be some instances when it is not the players fault --ie an emergency arises and a game of chess has to go on the back burner.
There are time when we have to disconnect for a good reason, but we're not talking about that. We are talking about chronic abusers who would have a very high percentage of disconnect/abandoned games. If a person let's say has an abandoned rate of 20%, that mean 2 out of every 10 games he abandons them. I think 20% or under is reasonable. But if a person has a 40% abandoned rate, then there is something wrong there and that person might be one to be avoided playing. Most of us get disconnected unexpectedly on a regular basis, but most of us have been able to reconnect now (thanks Erik) and finish out games. So for most of us the abandoned rate is going to be fairly low.
rooperi
I think it's a little unfair.
I hardly play live chess, because my connection doesn't hold up. I get many disconnects. My percentage would be very high. But every now and again, I try a few games to see if there's an improvement. I NEVER intentionally disconnect, and this stat would reflect badly on me, and not for anything I've done wrong.
I have over 1800 completed online games, without a single time-out. That should tell you something.
It's not the disconnects that annoy us, everyone gets disconnected, but most of us can reconnect within a reasonable time to get back in the game. It's the totally large amounts of abandoned games that would keep me from playing certain players. We all have a lot of disconnects, but not a lot of abandoned games.
qixel
Yes, letting us know abandoned-games percentages is a good idea, as long as the percentage does not count server disconnects, as rooperi says above.
I'm regularly disconnected by the server, maybe because I have a bad connection, but I certainly don't want to have those incidents count against me.
In addition, I've lost at least two games because of a disconnect that never successfully reconnected. I think I've won a few games that way too (when the disconnect happens on the other end).
In any case, Live Chess needs an interface that is more bulletproof. I'm just about ready to give up on Live Chess until my server disconnects drop to a reasonable level.
Amy
TheGrobe
Unfortunately discos are here to stay and have been since the 70s.
I'm not sure what clock issues you're referring to though -- there are clock corrcections that make it look like something odd is happening but they are legetimate adjustments.
HotFlow
People might have unreliable ISPs so this might be an unfair mark against their name.
Better would be to mark abondoned games in winning over losing positions. As a percentage or ratio, I believe that would be more accurate.
The clock corrections are for lag as a result of network latency and are perfectly legitimate. I explained it earlier today in some detail here:
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/help-support/live-chess----latency?lc=1#last_comment
And I meant this kind of discos:
GrooveHard
If you hardly play live chess, you wouldn't have that many disconnects. Perhaps you could stick to 1-3 days per move until you find a more reliable internet connection. Plus, if you don't have that great of a signal, could the reason be because you leech off somebody elses router? Just curious.
asampedas
I mean, what's the point of this, anyway? If you meet someone who likes to delay the game and abandon it, all you have to do is to let the seconds tick and then celebrate the victory.
Maybe you wouldn't feel the correct kind of victory. But what your opponent does is his or her problem. The thing is that you have just won your game, so just be happy and get on with life.
Shhh....
Don't you know that anyone who doesn't blindly agree with these things is a troll?
Aggressive Response to 4...Nf6 in the Scotch
by Helzeth a few minutes ago
5/26/2012 - Ragozin - Veresov, Moscow 1945
by Kingfisher a few minutes ago
MAJOR MALFUNTION WITH LAST GAME!!!
by kco 2 minutes ago
Sharing your repertoire, good or bad?
by ChazR 9 minutes ago
~ Game 1: Anand vs. Gelfand - 2012 ~ Analysis ~
by RedBull1485 14 minutes ago
Mate With 4 Knights!!
by LycanWerewolf 16 minutes ago
Multiple team membership
by RumbleTumble 24 minutes ago
When is the new Vote Chess game Opening Experts vs Endgame Experts starting??
by Aditya_Deshpande8 56 minutes ago
Asking people to resign
by chrisr2212 62 minutes ago
Fritz 12 and no internet
by gutartas 63 minutes ago