Order of challenges...

Jump to forum:
« Previous | 1 2 | Next » | Last Post
25th October 2008, 09:33am
#1
by Fintan
Galway, Ireland Ireland
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 97

Question - would it be possible to list the challenges so that when one was accepted or created, it didn't result in the entire list shifting up or down? It's fierce difficult to click on the seek one actually wants sometimes...

25th October 2008, 09:54am
#2
by promotedpawn
Somewhere out there Great Britain
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 768

I agree. We are talking about live chess right?

29th October 2008, 05:45pm
#3
by chess_kebabs
Australia
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 26871

I can't see how this could be possible Fintan. Accepted seeks need to disappear to avoid confusion and there are always new seeks added. The way it works now is the only logical way I can see. Correct me if I am wrong someone.

29th October 2008, 06:24pm
#4
by erik
Mountain View, CA United States
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 10183

they disappear and reappear in batches every 3 seconds. we can't leave them there forever :)

29th October 2008, 06:40pm
#5
by grensley
Minnesota United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 406

They could go in a rotating fashion.  Each new seek would occupy the next available slot, but then it wouldn't move.  As soon as the seek is accepted, is disapears, then another one will fill that slot. (edit:  That is a horrible explanation, just read the example)

example:

0 seconds

seek 1

seek 2

seek 3

 

5 seconds: seek 2 accepted.  New seek created (named seek 4)

seek 1

seek 4

seek 3

 

10 seconds: seek 1 accepted, no new seeks

(empty slot)

seek 4

seek 3

 

15 seconds, someone makes a new seek (seek 5)

seek 5

seek 4 

seek 3

 

and so forth.  It may look a little botchy towards the end of the list from time to time,  but seeks wouldn't move (and thus, they would be readable and acceptable)

Even though I have very little experience programming, I can't imagine it would be that difficult...

29th October 2008, 06:42pm
#6
by TheGrobe
Calgary Canada
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 4617

How about combining the seeks and games tabs so that once a game is started the accept link becomes an observe link?  At least that way you'd have more sort options that could be used to mitigate the jumping around, and half the number of tabs to maintain.

29th October 2008, 06:44pm
#7
by grensley
Minnesota United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 406
TheGrobe wrote:

How about combining the seeks and games tabs so that once a game is started the accept link becomes an observe link?  At least that way you'd have more sort options that could be used to mitigate the jumping around, and half the number of tabs to maintain.

there would also be a manhunt for games to accept.


29th October 2008, 06:44pm
#8
by staggerlee
Clermont-Ferrand France
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 809

I second this.

29th October 2008, 06:48pm
#9
by chess_kebabs
Australia
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 26871

And at what point do you delete them..... I can't see this working well either. Really, the way it is set up now is the least confusing way...Just gotta  be a bit more snappier with your selecting....it's fun trying to grab the one you want!

29th October 2008, 08:17pm
#10
by TheGrobe
Calgary Canada
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 4617
grensley wrote:
TheGrobe wrote:

How about combining the seeks and games tabs so that once a game is started the accept link becomes an observe link?  At least that way you'd have more sort options that could be used to mitigate the jumping around, and half the number of tabs to maintain.

there would also be a manhunt for games to accept.



Not if you sorted appropriately.

3rd November 2008, 04:57pm
#11
by grensley
Minnesota United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 406

true...but you would pretty much have the same problem.  Once games are accepted, they change positions

3rd November 2008, 05:07pm
#12
by TheGrobe
Calgary Canada
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 4617

As Erik has pointed out, you have to deal with the change in the status of seeks at some point -- my feeling is that combining the tabs would give the flexibility to either group all of the open seeks together, or to keep accepted seeks from jumping around -- at least until a game is completed.  I don't think there's any solution that lets you have it both ways.

Perhaps I can suggest another option:  I think it would help to only list those seeks that a user is able to accept -- this would mitigate a lot of the changes as many seeks are irrelevant to each user due to rating limit settings etc. and don't even need to be shown in the first place.

3rd November 2008, 05:22pm
#13
by chess_kebabs
Australia
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 26871

That would be a GREAT idea TheGrobe, list only the seeks that each user is able to.... Though it seems pretty complicated to write, but I am sure the geniuses here, Piotr and the like, will master it... I guess it is similar to Open Seeks and how they work. This would take the edge of the jumping around too. 

3rd November 2008, 05:26pm
#14
by TheGrobe
Calgary Canada
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 4617

I don't actually think it should be that hard to do at all provided it's handled on the client side.

3rd November 2008, 05:34pm
#15
by erik
Mountain View, CA United States
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 10183
TheGrobe wrote:

I don't actually think it should be that hard to do at all provided it's handled on the client side.


seek filters are coming in November :)

3rd November 2008, 05:40pm
#16
by Erudite
A small town in GA United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 132

"seek filters are coming in November :)"

Thank GOD!

3rd November 2008, 05:40pm
#17
by chess_kebabs
Australia
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 26871

Gotta love those seek filters....

3rd November 2008, 07:06pm
#18
by TheGrobe
Calgary Canada
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 4617

Well there you have it -- as usual, the chess.com staff is one step ahead of the masses.  I know I've said it before but it bears repeating:  You guys do great work.

20th November 2008, 09:44am
#19
by TheGrobe
Calgary Canada
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 4617

I notice that the seek filters are in place and players can now filter their seeks by Game Time range, Rating Range (presumably the seek creator's rating?) and "Premium Only".  This is a great new feature that should help with this issue, but it seems to me that there the most relevant filter is missing: 

"Show only those games that I'm eligible to accept"

Isn't this the view that most players would be interested in seeing?  The seeks I can't accept are of no value to me, so showing them just adds unnecessary clutter.

20th November 2008, 03:21pm
#20
by erik
Mountain View, CA United States
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 10183
TheGrobe wrote:

I notice that the seek filters are in place and players can now filter their seeks by Game Time range, Rating Range (presumably the seek creator's rating?) and "Premium Only".  This is a great new feature that should help with this issue, but it seems to me that there the most relevant filter is missing: 

"Show only those games that I'm eligible to accept"

Isn't this the view that most players would be interested in seeing?  The seeks I can't accept are of no value to me, so showing them just adds unnecessary clutter.


excellent point!

« Previous | 1 2 | Next » | Last Post

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.