8763 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
New player here at live chess (online and overtheboard) and wondering about whether or not one should resign an obviously losing position or play it to the bitter end in the hope that the strong position either fails to checkmate and possibly lose on time or creates a stalemate... ? is there an ethical rule of thumb which is expected to be respected ? Thanks for help.
I would suggest that you resign if you can clearly see how YOU would force a win (if the situation were reversed), and if the opponent has already demonstrated that he is at least as good a player as you are.
Different strokes for different folks, though.
thanks for taking the time to write this... it helps me see the situation from a certain angle, which, to say the least is really tricky in the case of 2 very low ranked players...
You are also suggesting that your suggestion would not be followed by everyone..Cheers.
If I play badly enough and the situation is hopeless, I usually resign out of frustration.
Honestly, if your in a situation where you can get a stailmate, its a whole new way of looking at the game. A complete new set of tactics. It is a challenge, although your opponant may not appreciate it. But hey, if he/she cant take a joke.
Q/k vs. k. is an easy mate......because stale-mate can arise by a mistake is no reason to play on. RESIGN !
You'll figure it out, keep playing.
My rule of thumb is if I would be embarrassed to have someone walk over to my board and take a look, then it's best to resign before someone sees the horrible blunders I've played.
He should resign and spend about five minutes studying the RKvsK endgame.
Nah, just check out this game:
Not only is this a total lost game but I encourage my opponent just to keep on, since he'll learn about Rook/King v. King endgames. I told him I wouldn't care if the game lasted for another six months at this rate.
There's nothing he could learn from that because he has no influence over the game at all. If he doesn't know how to mate here then the moves will just seem random until they're explained.
And you'll only get that from books, articles or practice games - not while getting beat and having no idea why.
Oh, I dont know about that, you can learn a lot from getting beat. Yes, it would be better if someone could explain why, and where. What sometimes baffles me is when someone just ups and resigns when they are in a better position. I always wonder, wow what did I do really right, what was he seeing that I was not, or did he just have to go.
6/19/2013 - Short and Sweet
by waynedickinson2 a few minutes ago
My debut game
by Immortal-Gladiator a few minutes ago
by Steve212000 5 minutes ago
Borislav Ivanov's recent games
by FirebrandX 7 minutes ago
Do u start with queen?
by 666AAA666 8 minutes ago
I feel that I deserve a higher rating
by FN_Perfect_Idiot 9 minutes ago
Post your best miniatures here
by Oran_perrett 10 minutes ago
Chess starts at 2300...
by ArbitraryChess 12 minutes ago
Would a 2000 ELO player beat Kasparov if he had a piece advantage?
by CLINTEASTW00D 25 minutes ago
by tesla1 29 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com