Another Problem the Computer Couldn't Solve

Jump to forum:
« Previous | 1 2 3 | Next » | Last Post
13th August 2008, 03:30am
#41
by Dyab71
Saida Lebanon
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 186

solved it,

piece of cacke

13th August 2008, 07:53am
#42
by TheJoKer-1s
Amsterdam Netherlands
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 73

silentfilmstar13 wrote: Why was h3 not possible on Black's last move?


It's possible but it doesn't matter, the mate still happens after black moves his pawn to h3

13th August 2008, 08:59am
#43
by normajeanyates
london [often in calcutta india] England
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 2597

another one of those easier retro-problems disguised as mate-in-n --- yawn.

There are some real difficult ones of this kind... [of course the computer can solve it if you give it the right fen ;) ] the diagram has the wrong fen - if you click the pgn/fen dropdown box , then THAT fen has no mate-in-2!

Oh piotr has covered that in his post...

13th August 2008, 09:22am
#44
by Elprede
New Jersey United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 54

i solved it. pretty easy.

13th August 2008, 10:28am
#45
by Djalal
Algiers City Algeria
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 27

I think the solution is similar to that of  the problem "mate in one". Don't forget anything "en passant"Wink

13th August 2008, 10:38am
#46
by brsaran
Chennai India
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 1

i can see it

13th August 2008, 07:08pm
#47
by nimzovich
United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 694

Quite enjoyable!

Thank you for posting the problem!

13th August 2008, 11:56pm
#48
by diskamyl
International
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 284

bobito75 wrote:

Salam

Let thing with us ... because i don't solve it ...

but please if any Genius solve it don't write the solution now ... give more time to thinking

write only " i solved "

and thanks

 White to play and mate in two moves

 

 


a wrong FEN position with the title "computers can't solve it"?

Yeah yeah, we know humans are smarter...

28th August 2008, 06:43am
#49
by DaveN
New York City United States
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 28

solved it fast... This is a sweet mate. Pretty simple, don't know why the computer couldn't solve it.

28th August 2008, 04:14pm
#50
by dmeng
Knoxville, TN United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 308

einstein_69101 wrote: I see the solution.  This has a similiar idea the other problem the computer couldn't solve.  The key hint is to think about what was blacks last move.  It is possible to find out just by looking at this setup.  I can provide the solution if people want me to later.  :)


I admit, I didn't see it until I saw this comment.

28th August 2008, 04:16pm
#51
by dmeng
Knoxville, TN United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 308

oeteg wrote:

All this talk about "en pasant"...

This is another option:

1. Bc2 h2 (1... h5 2. Bxh7#) 2. Bxh7#

Nice and easy


Your option doesn't work because Black plays 1. ...fxe6

4th September 2008, 05:54pm
#52
by Bignet
Boston United States
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 3

i think there is another problem. what if the c5 pawn had originally been on c7 and had then taken a pawn on d6, and right before the position presented before us, had taken a pawn that could hypothetically be on c5. This would then prevent the en passant and therefore prevent the mate in 2 unless we are told the last move was pawn to c5

5th September 2008, 03:10pm
#53
by lotus_elise
olongapo Philippines
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 428

i cant understand??????

5th September 2008, 03:22pm
#54
by SherlockDotNet
Montreal Canada
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 106

Damn En Passant... though now it makes sense! Yay, got it!

« Previous | 1 2 3 | Next » | Last Post

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.