18332 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
None of the people who found Rd5 analysis could have done it without a computer...
but yes: the combo from start to finish is as follows:
I did it without a computer, and stopped analysing after 5...Rd6 6.d5 ed5. I missed the stronger 6...Qf2+ 7.Kh1 Rxd5, but the fact is that even a player rated around 1200 should have absolutely no trouble winning this, using half a dozen of ways. Where's your beef?
...Rxe3 is pretty obvious, although I do admit I'm not able to calculate much past that. I suspect the IM you showed it to saw the move right away, then spent a bunch of time analyzing it to figure out the lines a few moves deeper.
Anyone can see Rxe3. The point is Rd5. And some people rated 2200 couldn't win the position pfren, the Rd5 move is too far off in the calculations.
Rxe3 is easy to play in a puzzle, but not so easy in a tournament. Seems hard to play this move on principal, you had to calculate to make sure there is a mating attack. I probably woudln't find it in a game.
As for "Rd5 is too far off to see" lol. No it's not. After you see the theme of mate attack, moves like this pop out. I don't think I would have found this in a real game, but as a puzzle it's not beyond me to solve it (although I bet I'd spend many more minutes looking for the win than pfren heh).
As for solving it during a real game, the idea of an attack is clear, the player would just have to be experienced / stubborn enough to find the correct moves (a lot of time on your clock would help too ;)
lol remember this stupid thread anyone? it was the first one I ever posted, and I had just said something stupid to waffllemaster which I've deleted now. lol
Oh, you're a different fianchetto, weird.
Yeah, this combination is a very nice example. I have problems finding attacking ideas in real games, this is a good one for me to be sure to remember.
Fianchetto1967 is NOT me, he is someone else.
What's your favorite excuse for why you lost a game of chess?
by TurboFish a few minutes ago
by kaynight 5 minutes ago
A "Proper" Chess Diet
by wolverine96 5 minutes ago
New Chess.com? Wha....?
by TasmanianTiger 7 minutes ago
4/25/2015 - A. K. - Christian Stevens, 2007
by wolverine96 11 minutes ago
#2 is Anand now!
by Reb 13 minutes ago
Staffs not banning cheating related threads
by EscherehcsE 16 minutes ago
What Would a Bright Person Do?
by DrSpudnik 23 minutes ago
Nigel Short: Women's brains not chess brains
by richie_and_oprah 23 minutes ago
who do you think is the best chess player ever?
by Grundelplith_MD 25 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!