9112 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
LYCAN148
What is the maximum amout of pieces that can be placed on a chess board in a LEGAL POSITION so that no piece attacks any other?
Um...no,the white and black pieces can't attack each other
Tyzer
Are we talking "no black piece attacks a white piece and vice versa" here, or are we talking "no piece attacks or defends any other piece here"? And do you want both black and white pieces, or just one colour? (although in the latter scenario, it doesn't matter what colour the pieces are...)
EDIT: Oh wait, it does matter, there's the question of the pawns.
We are talking "no piece attacks or defends any other piece here"
kco
got 22
Okay. So both black and white pieces, or just one colour?
rooperi
Also got 22
Both,and 22 is not the most,,but,can you show it?
Oh, mine's wrong, the pawns are defending other pawns....
lol
try again.... I'm not sure this position can be reached?
mine is a little different to rooperi, I put the row of pawns on the very first and last row on the board
The position is good,but 22 is a few pieces short...
bondiggity
That is most definitely not a Legal position, if legal is to be meant reached through a game of chess
Yes
Interesting puzzle. Maybe in the morning I'll look at it again
Its not 24 either,its higher
Looks like fun. If there's more than 24 then that means there are more bishops or rooks on the board, which I'm struggling with at the moment...those things eat up loads of room. And don't even get me started on the queens.
EDIT: A position with 26 pieces...letting the pawns get behind each other allowed me to squeeze in a few more pawns. The ideas I used were 1. to minimize the number of squares each piece defends (knights will only defend two squares when placed in the corner, and bishops will only cover 7 squares when placed anywhere along the edges or corners) and 2. to overlap the defended areas as much as possible (hence I placed the bishops where they would overlap with the knight's defended squares).
But I doubt it's a legal position, because I can't figure out a way to set up that pawn formation with less than 4 captures per side (there are only 3 pieces off the board for each side, so it doesn't seem possible).
FURTHER EDIT: Oh wait, it can be made legal simply by breaking the symmetry a little like this, which requires only 3 captures per side.
But I still cannot confirm whether 26 is the maximum...although I sincerely hope it is, since the only pieces left to bring in now are the rooks and queens. Given that each rook will eat up 14 squares and the queen at least 21 squares, it seems really difficult...although now that I look at the final position, it seems there could be a way to squeeze in a single rook on the g-file (most likely g2 or g7) with a little rearrangement of the pieces. Then again, that would mean one less capture is available, screwing up the pawn structure again. Gah.
WEll...actually it IS more than 26
*facepalms* Oh dear...time to break out the rooks.
Chess Seminars
by Pawnpusher3 a few minutes ago
5/26/2012 - Ragozin - Veresov, Moscow 1945
by xray a few minutes ago
CPOTM May 2012 cont.
by Joseph-S a few minutes ago
Why does TT deduct points when I solve problem?
by ChazR 9 minutes ago
Program that calculates rating by analyzing your games?
by VULPES_VULPES 14 minutes ago
Smith-Morra defence
by Neslanovac 17 minutes ago
Best trolling tactics you legally can do in OTB?
by pellik 19 minutes ago
My game against GM Michael Adams
by joeydvivre 25 minutes ago
Knight At Disadvantage But Wins the Match. (Even with Perfect Play From Black)
by Bishopful 30 minutes ago
Forum: Why blunders (and bad moves) lead you to lose
by wikipedia1286 38 minutes ago