9112 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
-waller-
People may have seen this one before.
-No piece has moved from a white square to a black one, and vice versa.
-The White king has made under 14 moves.
Prove that a promotion has taken place.
rooperi
Ok, my 1st thought is all the knights must have been captured on their starting squares without moving.....
[edit] TheMouse was too fast for me....]
Wow that was quick The Mouse! One slight omission:
It could have been a bishop, queen or rook that had captured the knight, but it would have to have been a promoted one!
But essentially the same.
Well, I'll give you another one:
A white bishop has been knocked off the board, from either the e3 or e4 square. You did not see which - but can you deduce it?
Its another monochromatic by the way (game where no piece moves from a white to black square, or vice versa).
JageColorTone
Hmm...lots of things here...I just think it out as I type...
It seems that white and black start with only three pieces each (besides pawns) that can take on black squares at all. One, the c1 bishop, never moved, so it could not have taken back, so there's one imbalance. The king could never have taken back (no access) so the only white piece which could have taken the piece which took white's c1 bishop would be his a1 rook, before being taken in turn. The white king could have done some work in black's camp, but now I see the importance of the 14 move thing, because he has had to spend at least some taking the piece which took his knight, etc.
Ooh! Something else...the only piece which could have taken white's black rook and bishop would have been his queen, as the bishop (obviously) and rook (amazingly) could never have gotten there. So black's queen would have had to take them both...no, scratch that, she wouldn't have had to take both, as the a1 rook has almost certainly been lifted via a4...Oh, I got it now!
Black's b8 knight could obviously never have moved, and the only (non-promoted white piece) which COULD HAVE taken it would be the king (even with a lift, the a1 rook can't access that rank. Now, while he COULD have done that and gotten all the way back to his current starting position (exactly 14 moves) he couldn't also have taken black's pieces which took his rook and g1 knight, so he has (I think) very probably had to promote at least one of his other pawns that start on black squares.
edit: !ow, lots of people posted as I meandered! Cool puzzle.
Nice work Jage, you pretty much got it with your last paragraph. Notice its a lot simpler as I specified the king has made under 14 moves.
(white text)
He could have taken Black pieces on his way to b8 otherwise. But it has to be a promoted piece that takes the b8 knight, or else a pawn, which then promotes.
Oh, jeez...I glossed by that "under!" Ergo , the position is impossible without benefit of a promotion. Simpler.
jetfighter13
Can someone post a logical game that has an end postion like the one below
The last four half moves are given
After you have done that, have an engine complete an analysis
doodinthemood
....how did you even manage to mess up like that?
???
darnit let me try again
I posted it and it works so I want to see a game with that position
JMB2010
but jetfighter13 Qxe4#
you are right, do'h remove the g5 knight then
frrixz
...
?
TheMouse since closed his account, as a result all of his posts are deleted. Personally I think its silly and throws a lot out of context, but hey.
Anyone want to venture a solution to the second puzzle?
remember that the knight on g5 is not soposed to exisist or however you spell that word
I was talking about my second puzzle actually. (Post #3)
oh yeah duh ( I knew that lol)
Here is the last few moves aproxamately of a game I played After school against a group of friends.
I won, but they failed to see through it attempt at victory. I do remember it was a Ruy Lopez game where I pushed both my c and a pawns forward two my d pawn to d3 and he played the 3. a6 variation.
On puzzle 2: Your position is impossible with only monochromatic moves, because all the pieces stuck on dark squares that are allowed to move are gone. There must be at least one piece on a dark square that has moved, in order to eliminate the last of the other color. There would then be no piece allowed to take it. Obviously none of white's remaining pieces in this position can have moved.
Scandinavian Defense 2...Qxd5; 3...Qa5: why not 4 Nf3?
by Elubas a few minutes ago
Chess Seminars
by Pawnpusher3 3 minutes ago
5/26/2012 - Ragozin - Veresov, Moscow 1945
by xray 3 minutes ago
CPOTM May 2012 cont.
by Joseph-S 4 minutes ago
Why does TT deduct points when I solve problem?
by ChazR 11 minutes ago
Program that calculates rating by analyzing your games?
by VULPES_VULPES 16 minutes ago
Smith-Morra defence
by Neslanovac 19 minutes ago
Best trolling tactics you legally can do in OTB?
by pellik 21 minutes ago
My game against GM Michael Adams
by joeydvivre 27 minutes ago
Knight At Disadvantage But Wins the Match. (Even with Perfect Play From Black)
by Bishopful 32 minutes ago