^ Click here to remove ads! ^

FIDE changed the rules!

Jump to forum:
 
26th September 2007, 05:35am
#1
by pawnshover
United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 321

This puzzle is one of the reasons FIDE changed the chess rule about promoting. NOW the rule says pawns must promote to a piece of the SAME color!


26th September 2007, 07:21am
#2
by erik
Mountain View, CA United States
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 5427

explain?

 


26th September 2007, 01:09pm
#3
by maiona
Porto Alegre Brazil
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 60
He means before the change in the rules, white could promote to a black knight, which would be mate for white
29th September 2007, 01:05pm
#4
by MolotovRuss
Hampshire England
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 218

 

Ahh I see, of that's very clever. I didn't even know you could promote to an opposite-coloured piece though? Now, from this though, I can see why. 


29th September 2007, 01:07pm
#5
by chewybac5
Buffalo, NY United States
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 217
Wow ive never even considered promoting to a piece of the opposite color before, good to know that you cant and I wont have to worry about that position in any real game
29th September 2007, 01:15pm
#6
by jona004
Telford, UK England
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 356
I'm pretty hot on chess history. Now i'm not disagreeing with you, but i've never known of that rule before. The rules that we use now havn't changed since the 1600's and the days of Phillidor, way before FIDE existed. Have you proof of this? I'm intrigued.
29th September 2007, 01:37pm
#7
by chewybac5
Buffalo, NY United States
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 217
jona004 wrote: I'm pretty hot on chess history. Now i'm not disagreeing with you, but i've never known of that rule before. The rules that we use now havn't changed since the 1600's and the days of Phillidor, way before FIDE existed. Have you proof of this? I'm intrigued.

I concur it seems illogical that a set of rules would be written which allow promotion to a different color.


29th September 2007, 01:47pm
#8
by WEdgards
R'lyeh Switzerland
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 94

It also seems unlikely that there would have been a rule about NOT promoting to the opposite colour. :)

"But nothing says I can't!"


29th September 2007, 03:18pm
#9
by jona004
Telford, UK England
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 356
I think this is a wind up and we've been had...drat that pesky pawnshover. :)
29th September 2007, 03:27pm
#10
by chewybac5
Buffalo, NY United States
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 217
jona004 wrote: I think this is a wind up and we've been had...drat that pesky pawnshover. :)

hehe thats so ticky....


29th September 2007, 05:19pm
#11
by Logicalfan10
Wantirna South, VIC Australia
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 131
I never knew that there was a rule  that said you can change to a different colour! At least now it's less confusing now they changed the rule.
29th September 2007, 05:22pm
#12
by Etienne
Montreal, Quebec Canada
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 780
FIDE didn't change any rules, you cannot promote to a piece of the opposite color pawnshover is just being weird. Tongue out
29th September 2007, 05:35pm
#13
by chewybac5
Buffalo, NY United States
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 217
Etienne wrote: FIDE didn't change any rules, you cannot promote to a piece of the opposite color pawnshover is just being weird.

That would be quite the interesting arguement in a tourny though in that position, The rules dont specifically state I cant promote to a different color....Tongue out


30th September 2007, 10:52am
#14
by jona004
Telford, UK England
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 356
chewybac5 wrote: Etienne wrote: FIDE didn't change any rules, you cannot promote to a piece of the opposite color pawnshover is just being weird.

That would be quite the interesting arguement in a tourny though in that position, The rules dont specifically state I cant promote to a different color....


The rules says i can't move a knight the same way i would a rook, that doesn't mean to say i can.


30th September 2007, 11:06am
#15
by HotFlow
KL, Malaysia Malaysia
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 529

Yes Jona, lift move place down... (dear o dear?)


 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.