18310 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
FIDE had to change the rules again after this puzzle! NOW the rule says castling can only be done with Rooks in the same rank.
White to play Mate in three!!!
I'm not sure 'changing' the rules is the right word, since this had never come up in the past. It's more like 'clarifying' the rules. The rook was formerly a pawn (which obviously had moved), so they just wanted to clear up the ambiguity.
(OK, sorry for the nitpicking... )
Clarifying does sound better. I guess this hasn't happened much in tournament play. Who would leave off castling and have a centralized King while the e-file is semi-open?
Maybe "of the same color" was always in the rule books and folks were just not very good at looking up rules. But that has nothing to do with this puzzle. This is about the castling rules, not the promotion rules. In 1972 when Tim Krabbe made this puzzle this form of castling was still legal.
Leave it to people to squabble over rules anyway no matter how simple and clear they are to most of us.
Actually, I think the last guy is right. Castling is a King move and the rules of touch move say you touch it you move it so he would have to move his Rook.
1) was once correct now incorrect
3) is correct in a touch move game, but most ppl would would let it slide its just being an ass too your opponent.
I remember hearing on NPR that the Catholic church tried (and failed) to make it illegal to have two queens, because they thought that the idea would somehow undermine their power.
how do you know that Fide change the rule
no it wouldn't froilan. you're moving the king too far. to castle, the king moves only 2 spaces towards whichever rook, and the rook jumps over. so the king would not be moving through check here.
it does not matter if the rook moves through threatened space. that's still legal.
Now I'm totally confused. If you move the white king two squares toward the rook on the back row, you place it right next to the black king, and thus in check. I'm not sure I understand what this puzzle's all about.
Can someone clarify??
The fact anybody had to actually complain they could not castle that way is ridiculous
$7 = Play a master + Game Analysis
by illmaculate 2 minutes ago
Will ever be born a player better than Karpov?
by melyob 3 minutes ago
Is there no limit to the number of concurrent online games?
by notmtwain 3 minutes ago
12/25/2014 - Mate in 5
by ZippingLou 4 minutes ago
Solution to Avoid Lots of Sicilian Theory
by Chicken_Monster 5 minutes ago
12/26/2014 - Karpov-Huebner, Montreal 1979
by HeidiXie 6 minutes ago
Why did my opponent resign
by GM_Phrostbyte 10 minutes ago
remove friends !
by _Jellyfish_ 13 minutes ago
I miss AndyClifton
by pdela 15 minutes ago
The Grob, the ultimate opening
by chyss 16 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!