15225 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Hey everyone, the start of summer has given me the drive to break out some of my unfinished tactics books. Currently I am going through "303 Tricky Checkmates" by Fred Wilson & Bruce Albertson. Problem #245 (on page 142 if anyone has the book) is supposedly a "White to Move & Mate in 3" problem, yet I believe white can do it even easier in just two moves. Here is the problem with the book solution which is 1. Kf6 cxd6 2. Ke7 dxc5 3. Nf6#:
My question is, couldn't this problem be solved in just two moves with 1.Ne6 cxd6 (forced) 2. Nc7#. That is what I saw at first and was confused when I read through the book answer. Have I outsmarted the masters? (Jokes!) But I believe that's a simple, legal checkmate that occurs an entire move faster. Am I mistaken somewhere?
1. Ne6 allows black to defend in a new way by playing 1...c5. After that, the black king can escape to c6, so there will be no mate in two.
This has happend to me alot in that book. It's really tricky to see everything in some positions.
Ahhh duh! How did I not see that before? I swear, tunnel vision sometimes...Thank you very much CM ilmago. AtahanT, it really does live up to it's title of "tricky" checkmates doesn't it?!?!
I remember this position. Isn't it composed by R. Zangger or something like that
Also, a book with a bunch of composed problems isn't really about tactics training more about "seeing" nice things on a chess board
I'm not sure heinzie, I don't think it says where they get the problems from.
It's a good way to train visualization and calculation accuracy. You really need to calculate accurately to solve many of these.
7/24/2014 - Mate in 5
by AnishBhargava a few minutes ago
How do you feel about players who win by cowardly queening a pawn
by BasterdSonOfTal a few minutes ago
How good do you have to be to play the Sicilian
by SilentKnighte5 a few minutes ago
Ponziani: Impractical in non-computer Correspondence Chess?
by SmyslovFan 2 minutes ago
Poker Chess Magic The Gathering Baccarat
by Till_98 3 minutes ago
Is being self taught good or bad?
by Mersaphe 4 minutes ago
i dont understand this GM's thought process...
by returnofxpchesser 21 minutes ago
Hou Yifan preparing to replace Judit Polgar as Women's #1?
by ielosubmarine 24 minutes ago
PHOTOS and VIDEOS
by craftysusie 28 minutes ago
Don't checkmate the King
by Akatsuki64 33 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!