15954 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Hello, this is omglolbbqpizza again, the outrageous puzzle solver.
I haven't made or found any puzzles, but I did find this puzzle in a book.
When you think you've seen everything....see this puzzle.
Is there really a mate in two? If you did 1. Kg1? (doing Qf2#) then 1...h2+! and mate in two is lost.
Very helpful tip: You've saw my puzzles before, and this one is no exception.
yeah yeah nice brains you,ve got....reverse castles.......
The only 2-move mate I can see here is...
1 Rf1+ Kxg3 2 Qf2#
...but that's not forced (Black can move his king to e3 instead of taking the pawn).
That may be a typo in the book. I don't think there is a mate in 2 (forced moves) for this puzzle. There are a couple of mate in 3.
Either way, White wins.
@jakeryan150482: But, if not forced mate counts, black also has mate in 2
Just move the king to h2 , and after queen f5 , and white wons
And black's move is??
1 Kh2 and it's (stale)mate in one
Reverse castles is like 1. O-O with the king ending on f1 and the rook on g1?
You do not have to do a reverse caste. Just move the king to G1, black has to take pawn, move queen to F2
Yes, the correct move is 1 0-0. It's a really ridiculous problem where White claims that the pieces are placed, and there has been no previous play. Therefore, he can castle. Then 2 Qe2# on the next move mates.
And no, 1 Kg1 fails to 1...h2+! preventing mate on the next move.
Yes, the correct move is 1 0-0.
Rather, reverse castles (like heinzie said).
After 1.Kg1, Black is not forced into 1...Kxg6 2.Qf2#. So, 1.Kg1 h2+ cooks a mate in 2.
Is it not that the Rules of Chess has no provision for so-called "Reverse Castling". Therefore, 1.0-0 is an illegal move is it not.
Btw I hate stupid crap like that. You spend a whole bunch of time trying to solve something, finally throw your hands up in the air, only to be told that it all gets done with pixie dust.
It's like having somebody set up the position wrong on you.
Yes, the correct move is 1 0-0. It's a really ridiculous problem where White claims that the pieces are placed, and there has been no previous play.
Even more ridiculous is that we have to just assume it's the white-king-starts-on-h1 chess variation! I mean, really, they ought to give us that information so we can deduce that reverse castling is the correct response.
The answer is... Reverse Castle 0-0! (forced mate next move!) Actually, the whole puzzle is a joke.
I couldn't beleive when I shared it to my freinds, they couldn't solve it.
As I said, it is clearly a mate in one.
This looks right. No reverse castling, strange assumptions, or anything else necessary.
9/23/2014 - Mate in 3
by aki907 a few minutes ago
ads on premium account!
by soupram 2 minutes ago
by kenl22003 3 minutes ago
19 years old - too late to become a pro?
by eehc 4 minutes ago
1,000 signs you play chess too much.
by Nine_fires 9 minutes ago
Is this position legal?
by Guerau 9 minutes ago
by chessmicky 11 minutes ago
New Chess player looking for solid opeing.
by cheesemate 18 minutes ago
by Martin_Stahl 34 minutes ago
by mohamed-damaj 35 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!