Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Mate in 4


  • 3 years ago · Quote · #1

    SirVicious

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #2

    SirVicious

    too easy?

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #3

    ILuvPawn

    10acious wrote:

    3.Bd6 Ke8 4.Qe7#


    This is perhaps the most obvious continuation.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #4

    SirVicious

    Well... the wrong answer is a step in the right direction!

    But,you have to solve for how i did it!

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #5

    EarlPurple

    If this was a real game why is your opponent still playing on so far behind, and how come it took you so long to castle?

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #6

    sen_kwan

    SirVicious wrote:

    Well... the wrong answer is a step in the right direction!

    But,you have to solve for how i did it!


    if there is another mate in 4.. better make it as a diagram..

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #7

    SirVicious

    lol,the game was a few minutes long. It wasn't necessary to castle.
    It was played a few days ago against my brother. I saw both mates at once.
    So i played the more stylish of the two.

    "If there is another mate"! Please, this hardly constitutes a puzzle. It's child's play!

    So far, I have solved every puzzle on chess.com without a single mistake!

    I'm about to solve the "Inhumanly difficult puzzle"!Perhaps i should post the answer!

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #8

    SirVicious

    I see that this is an epic failure. The answer is 1.Ng4 g5 2.Qf6 Kf8 3.0-0-0 gxf4 4.Rd8

    ...later

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #9

    ShadowIKnight

    you epic failures, I doubt you have solved every puzzle in one go D:
    bb xD

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #10

    SirVicious

    Well, i have to take that back. In fact, i couldn't solve the "Inhumanly difficult puzzle"! Otherwise, the truth remains true regardless of presumption!

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #11

    SirVicious

    "As when the wounded Satan leaned upon his spear,forthwith,on all sides,to his aid was run. By angels...many and strong."


Back to Top

Post your reply: