it can also be a mate in four. look out for that.
yeah the mate in 4 moves makes more sense to me
I don't understand the second rook sacrifice. You could move 2Qh1+ and then have mate in 3, right?
You guys, it was obviously to get him in a feeding-frenzy making him think he was finishing the game with suicide after suicide. His way works best.
yeah it can be mate in 3, but i like my suicides, makes life look cool =)
Yeah, why the extra rook sacrafice? Could have done the same without it.
Yes, it's technically mate-in-four, because the Bishop on e7 could be brought in the path of the Queen.
The extra Rook sac is just evil, like torturing an opponent. Tut-tut.
Bh4 stalls it for another move
should be mate in three
Evan is rt. Mate n 3
yeah, could be mate in 3, but still awesome!
2. Qh1+ Kg8 3. Qh7#
ADK
you guys are wrong its mate in 4. look at my previous comment.
The correct moves are1. Rh8+ Kxh8 2. Rh1+ Kg8 3. Rh8+ Kxh8 4. Qh1+ Kg8 5. Qh7#.
But isn´t it much easier to use the queen instead of the rook who was at the beginning on A1?
Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.