Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Mate in 64!!

Jump to forum:
« Previous | 1 2 3 | Next » | Last Post
21st November 2008, 03:59am
#1
by Chessroshi
Indianapolis United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 739
21st November 2008, 09:26am
#2
by pcfilho
Rio de Janeiro, RJ Brazil
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 229

????

21st November 2008, 09:38am
#3
by maartenotten
Vriezenveen Netherlands
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 155

crap

21st November 2008, 09:41am
#4
by esolom
United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 57

I figured it out, but I don't want to give it away...  ;o)

21st November 2008, 09:51am
#5
by omgkittensmewmewmew
sint kruis Belgium
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 7

pls die, ty

21st November 2008, 08:03pm
#6
by bombmeself
New York City United States
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 31

uh is this not an interactive puzzle

?

21st November 2008, 08:18pm
#7
by maximus_dragon
Iowa United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 196

all the pawns are backwards and knights can just jump around it just a trick

21st November 2008, 09:04pm
#8
by Chessroshi
Indianapolis United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 739

<--> Uber Hint: The move can best be described as Neo-Classical Hyper-Accelerated, with just a touch of J'adoube. It's a novelty. Good luck all.

21st November 2008, 09:28pm
#9
by playu2
United States
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 83

Hyper-accelerated or hypo-accelerated?

21st November 2008, 09:35pm
#10
by bobmacambob
Sydney Australia
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 413

?????????????????????

21st November 2008, 11:10pm
#11
by willisl0
Minnesota United States
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 179
omgkittensmewmewmew wrote:

pls die, ty


 agreed

21st November 2008, 11:26pm
#12
by Chessroshi
Indianapolis United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 739

well don't get sore at me because you're not up with opening theory. TWIC had a major piece on it in April, it was the feature item mate. I'm just the monkey messenger. I can't come up with new fangled chess technology like that folks, all I do is play cymbals and wear a little hat. 

21st November 2008, 11:38pm
#13
by diemking
United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 200

...

21st November 2008, 11:56pm
#14
by ashwath
bangalore India
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 2179

hahahahaha.................... great puzzle

21st November 2008, 11:56pm
#15
by ashwath
bangalore India
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 2179

greatest indeed

22nd November 2008, 12:30am
#16
by Narz
Pitman, NJ United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 3358

This thread is awesome! Laughing

22nd November 2008, 12:48am
#17
by Chessroshi
Indianapolis United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 739

thank goodness! I was worried there for a bit that Esolom was the only one who would find the "solution

22nd November 2008, 07:26am
#18
by PKTITUN
Kanpur India
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 4

just die,pls.

22nd November 2008, 07:34am
#19
by atomichicken
United Kingdom
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 1285

I don't get the joke. Is there supposed to be some irony in it?

22nd November 2008, 08:08am
#20
by einstein_69101
Nebraska United States
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 7426

maybe it was mate in the 64 squares instead of 64 moves.  :)

« Previous | 1 2 3 | Next » | Last Post

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.