Nabokov's Luzhin Defense

Jump to forum:
 
17th August 2008, 03:36pm
#1
by Escapest_Pawn
MISSOULA,MT United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 743

Several month's back, there was a forum on chess in movies, and I said I would re-watch the Luzhin Defense and post the final winning position.  I did not do so. and apologize to the original forum.  I failed to find the position discussed anywhere on the web.  The movie was not written to appeal to chess players, and the position is "bleeped over" annoyingly quickly requiring the use of the pause and slo-mo buttons, none of the moves are as clear as they should be and two of the moves in the winning sequence are not shown at all.  However, it was decodable, and assuming I enter the position correctly, I got it.  Nabokov was an accomplished player and puzzle maker.

The hero, the unkempt Luzhin, is black and down a knight.  During adjournment, he died, but his bride has acquired his notes.  The dashing what's-his-name is white and does not believe there is a solution.  Without intending a spoiler, I should mention this is a black-to-move-and-win problem, not a forced mate in all combinations problem.  Please try to see it through before moving.

 

17th August 2008, 03:42pm
#2
by Escapest_Pawn
MISSOULA,MT United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 743

To be able to do such a thing just once OTB, and I will retire with a permanent smug obnoxious grin until some friend (or enemy) punches me out and brings me back to earth.

17th August 2008, 03:55pm
#3
by Escapest_Pawn
MISSOULA,MT United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 743

Dmytro, I think that last rook sac would have been hard to see from the beginning and necessary to see from the beginning.  I would like to get ahold of the book and see if Nabokov actually put the position in there or if the movie makers just asked around for a good position. I could just ask here, of course? 

17th August 2008, 04:09pm
#4
by shuttlechess92
California United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 1894

wow that was really nice puzzle

17th August 2008, 04:14pm
#5
by normajeanyates
london [often in calcutta india] England
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 2597

that was really good!

17th August 2008, 04:28pm
#6
by jdthompson
United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 316
17th August 2008, 04:29pm
#7
by gabrielconroy
London United Kingdom
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 1506

Stylish! It seems Nabokov was a good puzzle composer as well as being a brilliant writer.

17th August 2008, 04:33pm
#8
by normajeanyates
london [often in calcutta india] England
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 2597

afair it wasn't in the novel - but i don't have a copy at hand now to confirm it [i read it 29 years ago; i've not seen the new reprint]

17th August 2008, 04:42pm
#9
by Escapest_Pawn
MISSOULA,MT United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 743

JD Good link and respect to your Googling skills.  I got tired after 5-6 pages of potential links.

Norma Jean, The local library does not have it (I could, of course order it) and If your memory is accurate, than it may not be a Nabokov puzzle at all.

Thank you both.

18th August 2008, 10:20am
#10
by planauts
Brampton Canada
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 333

very nice

18th August 2008, 11:14am
#11
by Dreadnought
Illinois United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 36

Nabokov reputedly played at master strength.  The book is far superior (but not an easy read) to the movie.

18th August 2008, 12:23pm
#12
by phishcake5
California United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 793

I enjoyed that very much.  Like that you came back and fulfilled your promise of long ago;)

Didn't care for the film, but still want to give the novel a chance sometime even though I'm not much of a Nabokov fan.

18th August 2008, 12:58pm
#13
by jdthompson
United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 316

I am currently reading the book. While it is a little slow going it is a good book. I haven't seen the film but thus far the book doesn't give any actual chess moves but instead simply refers to his mysterious defence without outlining what exactly it is.

26th January 2009, 04:34pm
#14
by Tiger-13
Sydney Australia
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 1277

very nice

28th January 2009, 12:29am
#15
by normajeanyates
london [often in calcutta india] England
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 2597

you could download the book from 4shared, if that is legal in your juridiction ;)

28th January 2009, 01:15am
#16
by BorgQueen
Adelaide Australia
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 4769

Awesome position and win.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.