There's a mate in 3 - but this was quite cool (as my opponent didn't see until the 4th move in the sequence - he thought it was pointless time-wasting - there was a 20 second pause when he realised he wasn't miles ahead)
I liked that one pete, cool
BasicLvrCH8r wrote: Right. The second rook didn't need to be sacrificed, but seeing reactions after mate sacrifices is priceless.
yep basically it was using more moves
Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.
But how much do you know about the game - the history, the players, the rules, and more!? Take our quiz and compare your scores!
Mark all forum topics as READ