11048 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
He's starting to remind me about creationists.
How is that a good reply? Do tell.
Creationists use logical fallacies in order to circumvent strong arguments.
I simply corrected the mistakes certain users made.
A creationists would troll a thread about a chess puzzle.
Yes, that is what they are called.
Creationists also lie and make up unprovable claims.
It might not be a good reply, but this thread deserves nothing more. Let it dissolve into the internets graveyard, this is officially a bad thread.
You sound... crabby to me but I agree with you!
It looks like just about anything wins.1...Qb8 is strong.1...Rg2+, as you mentioned, is strong.1...Qc7 also wins.Houdini and Stockfish both prefer 1...Qb8 over 1...Rg2+
You should get a better engine then.
Better than Houdini? Seriously now.
Rybka is far more objective. I have had both analyze complex positons, and Rybka is always more accurate.
How would you know? You're a 1300 player.
Okay, I object, some of us may probably lose to you at chess, but that is no indication of if we know what we're talking about when it comes to software. I am impartial, I just think that is no just defence for saying you are right.
The point isn't about software. It's about objectively judging complex chess positions. For that, chess ability obviously matters.
I don't use the rating argument for things not related to actually playing chess.
Which claim is unprovable?
So why are you using Houdini in this thread- http://www.chess.com/forum/view/more-puzzles/white-to-play-and-gain-a-winning-advantage
Original 1950 Dubrovnik Chess Set
by goodknightmike a few minutes ago
Garry Kasparov Censored!
by bumiputra 4 minutes ago
Analyse This Useless Win Please !!
by ponz111 5 minutes ago
Game Anaylsis for April 1, 2015
by wrathss 12 minutes ago
Bowlder Attack: 1. e4 c5 2. Bc4?
by eltenedor 17 minutes ago
Luck in Chess
by Fiveofswords 17 minutes ago
4/1/2015 - Bringing The Enemy In
by ActivatePlan357 24 minutes ago
was my winning attack sound?
by Fiveofswords 32 minutes ago
by Nb3d2 39 minutes ago
A zugzwang you will rarely see
by Nb3d2 41 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!