13993 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Hope I got my diagram correctly.
Let's make it happen!
Ah Spassky always the attacker . I would have done 1.b4 with idea 1...Da6 2.b5 Da5 3.Tf4 idea Ta4.
So 1.b4 Da6 2.b5 Db7 is forced, and White queen swaps to a winning ending.
After 2.b5 is there something wrong with 2....Qa6.
@sisu: I tried 1.b4 idea first, too. Seems to force black to trade the queens after 1.b4 Qa6 2.b5 Qb7 because 2...Qa5 3.Rf4 looses even worse - black has no defence against Ra4 without further material losses
My second try was 1.Qc8 with the idea 1...Kf8 2.Rxf7+ Kxf7 3.Rf1 which simply transposes to the line played by Spassky after 3...Kg7
Of course 1.Rxf7+ is more brilliant but I would rather choose 1.b4 if I played this position at white side. This forcingly leads to a won endgame because of white's passers at queenside and material advantage.
It is interesting to see what chess engines "think" of this position. Stockfish, houdini and rybka all choose 1.Rxf7+ but then a pecular thing occurs. I input 1.b4 and after a longer thought (depth near 30) evaluate that position better than 1.Rxf7+
Thus, I am not that worried for not solving the puzzle at first take because what I wanted to play might be actually even a stronger move, though of course not so spectacular as the brilliant combination converting exchange up into piece up
The move sequence is 1.b4 Da6 2.b5 Da5. Therefore, the move 3.bxa6 does not exist.
Black's first move was already 1....Qa6.
So it is impossible for Black to be playing 2...Qa6 again.
So the thing that is wrong with 2...Qa6 is that 2...Qa6 is an illegal move not because of 3.bxa6.
For on White's 3rd move Black's Q can not be at a6 anymore.
Hope that clarifies everything.
I need an opening against 1. e4
by Jayhar0005 4 minutes ago
Chess.com recently hit 10 million members and there's a downside.
by Addicted-to-Chess97 10 minutes ago
Post Your Jokes Here!
by helloperson404 11 minutes ago
7/24/2014 - Mate in 5
by asmisma 12 minutes ago
close my account
by Geoff_Boggler 20 minutes ago
New Logic for Auto-pairing and Seek Graph!
by pawpatrol 22 minutes ago
by masoudhashemi 29 minutes ago
Ponziani: Impractical in non-computer Correspondence Chess?
by LuisGruezo 33 minutes ago
PHOTOS and VIDEOS
by Knights-Rule 36 minutes ago
A few questions on development (Questions inline)
by JackOfAllHobbies 39 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!