17190 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Unfortunately, I didn't do this as white...
No matter what black moves,
There are several mistakes (blunders) here...
Wait, Marvin, in your variation after 4. c3 Nf6, what if white goes now 5. Ng5? I will be in a better position to grab on e7 here than in your variation, as I'm holding the king-side in a death grip, a-la Carlsen vs. Anand 2012.
The presence of Qs on the board favors white as the attacker.
Moreover, exchange sacrifices on f6 are always a peril to fear, and so is an 2-rook invasion on f7. You can never chase my N from g5 as your Nf6 is also blocking the f-pawn.
- - - - - - - - -
On the other hand, it is true that in your variation after 4. Ng5 Qg7 5. QxQ+ (what I wanted to avoid with the move 4. c3) Kxg7 6. c4 Nb6. 7. Rdxe7 white still has a lot of pressure as black is really out of moves (7...Kf6 8. Nxh7+). Still it looks more cruel with the Qs on.
I missed the 5. Ng5 move... But I don't think it makes white any better...
a pleasure to discuss this position with you!
I'm sure you had something in mind in case I go 5. Ng5 Rfe8 6. h3 Rad8 7. Rexe7 but just didn't write it in.
If I were white, I would probably make my seventh move 7. Rdxe7, which is probably totally crushing! Let me know what you have against that.
Now that I look a bit more into it I do see 7. Rdxe7 Qxa2 which will lead to 8. Rxf7 Qxf7 9. Rxf7 Kxf7 10. Nxh7 which I think favors white as the king is exposed and harrassable.
About your 6. g3 variation -
But wait - I now see your ideas with the Q sacrifice, and the checking resource on c1 which I missed and suddenly your evaluation looks just right... pretty much refuting my 5. Ng5 as a winning try and making 4. Ng5 clearly superior to 4. c3.
Did you make this entire analysis on your own?
It looks like the capturing the e7 pawn on the seventh move is a blunder... It doesn't matter which rook does it - white seems to lose. It is a lot better to give up that pawn and actually make the position more solid.
The 1. c3? move is the problem. White keeps the advantage with an immediate 1. Ng5!That's a really interesting game :DSacrifices and combinations all over the place. Difficult to keep track of all of them :P
BTW, could you post the whole game?
The game isn't mine. But wait - I now see that you're a robot, so I guess that answers my question from last post... anyway thanks for posting :-) I'm more interested in dialogue with human analysts as I can always fire up my own Houdini and find 'the truth' about any position if I so like...
Don't dismiss engines that analyze a position that interests you as something bad. I like to watch through grandmaster's games with the use of a computer. You can guess what's the best variation, then check the engine's opinion. It helps you to find patterns that you can apply when you need to think for yourself in your games.By the way, that's how I learned to organise attacks against my opponents. Engines are really good at attacking play. I've played many games against engines and you can see when & how they prepare and initiate an attack against you (a pawn storm or a thematic sacrifice)... I've won a couple of OTB games in this style :DWell, I guess it's a matter of preference how you want to learn to play chess. Some prefer living people, some prefer just engines, I prefer both :)
I work quite enough with engines - analyzing my games, going through opening lines that interest me... however when I discuss positions here in this website, what interests me is to see how much I actually saw, and to pit it against someone else's brains. If I want the engine's truth of course I can use my own, which is a pretty decent version of Houdini...
It's true that a computer is very helpful in improving one's game, and I'm also getting many ideas from my own computers for my own games...
"Chess.com Highlights: Tashkent Grand Prix - RECAP! GM Alex Yermolinsky & GM Simon Williams "
Your Questions about Chess
by GIex a few minutes ago
Could someone make me a Chess game with no AI if I paid them?
by PeskyGnat 2 minutes ago
by saleh311 3 minutes ago
Hurt/Heal World Champions
by camberfoil 4 minutes ago
Want names for these situations...
by LuftWaffles 4 minutes ago
How Much Did Kasparov Earn During His Chess Career from Prize Winnings?
by harshi694 6 minutes ago
Max Lange: 9...g6
by lolurspammed 7 minutes ago
I very dissapointed with cheater
by ajian 9 minutes ago
Reproduction and Real Jaques of London Chess Set
by goodknightmike 13 minutes ago
10/30/2014 - Clever Mating Sequence
by JustinScoggins 19 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!