9247 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
zankfrappa
NOTE: This is the position just before Shulman's 21st move in the infamoustiebreaker that determined the 2010 U.S. Championship winner.If Shulman had played 21. Nb2 instead as Shahade and Ashley suggested couldhe have won or would Kamsky have drawn anyway?Remember, Kamsky was behind on time and according to the rules only had todraw as black to win the title. The complete game can be viewed under the"News" heading by author SonofPearl.
Fiveofswords
well i remember watching the game as it was played....I dont see why nb6 would have to be so clearly better than whatever he played (i dont remember exactly what it was)...white had very strong pressure well into the endgame, with constant winning chances...kamsky got into serious time pressure (and remember they both really didnt have much time in this game anyway)...the only moment white's advantage was blown was when they both started having to blitz their moves...this is not suprising since kamsky is an excellent blitz player.
Crazychessplaya
My gut feeling is that if one has more time on the clock than the opponent, and if the opponent is under time pressure, one should avoid simplifying the position. Nb2 in this position keeps more pieces on the board, which IMO should be an asset in the game.
oh nevermind nc6 IS what he played...and you wanted nb2...well...to play good chess you need a more sophisticated plan than just always refusing to exchange. The reason he had a time edge in the 1st place, and a good position for the whole game, is precisely because he followed a clear plan with simple moves and simple objectives. If he happened to have some plan about what do with the knight on b2 then maybe he wouldve played that, but I dont see why it should necessarily change the result. Without having any clear way to start getting into the black position (like via c6) its hard to see how Nb2 is necessarily even trying to play for a win.
Nb2 is not my suggestion. It was the suggestion of the announcers Shahade andAshley.I believe part of their reasoning was it avoided the queen exchange in additionto the time difference. I believe at this point Kamsky was down to only about 8 minutes while Shulman had about 15 minutes.
Chess and Checkers
by EricFleet 2 minutes ago
How to Avoid Mate in 2
by shoopi 10 minutes ago
e4/Nc3/Nf3/d4
by _grasshopper_ 12 minutes ago
English opening defense
by Schevenadorf 14 minutes ago
Power of 2 Bishops
by Triniboi4 22 minutes ago
19 move miniature against 2000+ level offline chess.com computer
by Br0kedChess 22 minutes ago
Do premium members get a free ride?
by reflectivist 28 minutes ago
Windmill and Cage-Fighting
by Master_Valek 28 minutes ago
I beat myself at chess every single time.
by reflectivist 31 minutes ago
5/20/2013 - Mate in 3
by heintz007 33 minutes ago