12601 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Why does everyone call me Cokehead?? It has nothing to do with my real name, makes no sense, what the hell?
Not everybody, bonehead...
jposthuma i already said that look at post 56
Oh yeah, I missed that. (47, by the way.)
Good idea, though. The only problem that I just realized is... which rating would you use? What if the player was unrated?
I don't think the point of the algorithm should be to favor the better move somehow, which would be hard to do anyway - it should just be to favor the move that better reflects the will of the team.
To that end, the algorithm should be to give the move to the last vote. This will be the vote cast by the member of the team who has had the most time to think about analysis and discussion on the vote. If that team member is a lousy player and ignores the analysis and advice of better players, then the team will lose, and I think a team like that deserves to lose.
The only points of debate I see here seem to assume that we want the algorithm to benefit the better move, but that's not the point in vote chess. Sometimes the better move will be the first voted, not the last, but just as much as a team should get credit for rallying back from a mistake, so too should they be punished for failing to convince everyone on their team of the better move. The fairest reflection of the team is the last vote either way whether better or worse than the first vote.
Frankly, I think it's basically comical that the site priveleges the vote cast by the team member with the least access to discussion and analysis from teammates - indeed, a team member who may even now regret their own vote! I'd want the tie-break to go with my team member with the most access to discussion. If that person ignores good analysis, we deserve to lose - if they do right we deserve the better option.
I agree with you totally regarding this: When there is a tied vote, It makes much more sense to me that the LAST voted on move should be the winning move, NOT the first. The rules of vote chess should be different than the rules of, say, a 50-yard dash, where the first across the line wins the race.
It has been 16 months since this dicussion was started. Has chess.com made any changes to the vote chess system? Has the rules been changed any on anything that has been dicussed here?
French vs Caro-Kann at the top level
by SenpaiOfDoom a few minutes ago
Best analysis engine for HUMAN game improvement
by pietman a few minutes ago
8/1/2015 - GM Shirov - GM Volokitin, Russian Club Cup, 2009
by roberto-pellicoro 3 minutes ago
Any black openings that will give me the bishop pair?
by SenpaiOfDoom 3 minutes ago
How did Magnus Carlsen defeated Garry Kasparov at age 13?
by user2468 9 minutes ago
How many farmers have reached master level?
by SenpaiOfDoom 15 minutes ago
Mid Game Analysis
by baddogno 15 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by Colin20G 17 minutes ago
Bobby Fischer or Magnus Carlsen
by GreedyPawnEater 17 minutes ago
How to get titles like FM, IM, NM, GM
by GreedyPawnEater 21 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!