11698 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Today's impossible puzzle, and the three people who posted "first" in it (presumably bragging that they'd solved it first -- hopefully not something as silly as just posting first) caused me to wonder whether something as simple as witholding the ability to hit the "Help" button on these for the first few hours might nip-this incredibly annoying behaviour in the bud.
Would anyone post "first" who couldn't back it up by being challenged to demonstrate that they'd actually solved the puzzle without the help of the "Help" button?
I don't know if it would work necessarily, but I like the idea in principle (possibly even for 24 hours) even if it does not.
'bump', liked the idea also someone should try and keep the second post empty and allowing it for explanation, variation and origin to the puzzle.
A pitty this got no more posts than ... a corndog... lol
I also like the idea. I don't like seeing the first page filled with "easy and first" when the next 100 posts are asking why not this or that move. It would be nice if the first few posters would explain the solution and why some reasonable looking alternatives don't work.
Also I would love to see a feature that records your correct/incorrect attempt at the daily puzzle. Not to embarrass anyone, but of course the person posting "first" at 2:00 am, literally seconds after the puzzle is put up, didn't even look at the puzzle much less attempt to solve it.
Likewise even on "simple" puzzles it takes me at least 20-60 seconds to make sure the line is correct and to make sure alternatives don't work. People who are rated 1000 and post "easy even for me, solved in 10 seconds!" and I'm thinking wth? It's obvious they just tried a bunch of moves until they reached the end.
does anyone remember all the "firsts" in the puzzle that was broken a few months ago? it actually tamed the first crowd for a while.
The corndog is a sign of stong agreement; Don't disrespect the all-American food.
Corndog ~ Condog
Semi-Slav vs. Nimzo-Indian
by gundamv a few minutes ago
12/6/2013 - Mate in 8
by kyuehe a few minutes ago
If you could combine two chess pieces powers what would the two pieces be???????
by chessbond001 a few minutes ago
Who is better Paul Morphy or Magnus Carlsen
by Spiritbro77 a few minutes ago
by clunney a few minutes ago
How do you identify strategical/tactical positions?
by roi_g11 3 minutes ago
December 5, 2013. Mate in 6
by White_Fang3 6 minutes ago
by yeres30 7 minutes ago
Thinking about trying the Nimzowitsch Defense, would you recommend trying it?
by PatzerEternal 7 minutes ago
QG - Tarrasch vs Albin Counter Gambit
by FromMuToYou 7 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!