[COMMENT DELETED]  Post #58 explains why this comment is deleted

I think the main problem is called "Generation Gap".

If the OP can delete comments it's not a forum. It's a blog.

+2

Interestingly, the OP yeres whats his name has blocked a large number of members because the great omnipotent yeres doesn't agree with their forum posts. I'm sure some of them would like to contribute to this thread but...they've already been blocked.

Now, he wants to delete their content too?! Insane!

So much for open dialog and conversation!

Dude, it's the internet. Get over it. Better yet, you think you're so special, the smartest guy on the planet start your own website. And don't let the door hit you on the posterior on your way out.

[COMMENT DELETED] Post #58 explains why this comment is deleted

[COMMENT DELETED] Post #58 explains why this comment is deleted

I quite enjoyed reading the link you posted. Toughen up big guy or the internet will eat you...

shut up yeres30 i'll eat you.

Are you a cannibal too? I'm hungry.

Should the author of a topic on post blocking be able to block posts from people who make comments about the author, if the author himself has commented on comments made by people who have responded to posts by people that the author has previously blocked, unless the blocked posters have commented previously on threads related to blocking users that contain posts about authors of unrelated threads who nevertheless have blocked comments about comment blocking?

I was just asking a simple question.

ALL WE NEED IS LOVE (all together now) ALL WE NEED IS LOVE (everybody) ALL WE NEED IS LOVE LOVE     LOVE IS ALL WE NEED

Try to "never argue with an idiot."  Or people won't be able to tell the two of you apart.

Is the OP arguing with himself, or everyone in this thread?  Maybe both.

And breathtaking, self-referential bullshit wins out?

It's the internet, dude.  Get over it.

I'm picturing 3 trillion humans singing that all hand-in-hand on the planet 200 years from now as they either suffocate or starve to death.

I'm agnostic about the comments being deleted, but this particular quote is spot on imo.

It is usually fallacious to engage in ad hominem attacks. 

I think ideas should be as vigorously discussed as possible, and even a little colorful language thrown in here and there to spice up the discussion.

But it is not logically valid to try to discredit the messenger UNLESS the messenger IS the message and unless the point about the messenger directly relates to the point of dispute with respect to the message.

[COMMENT DELETED]

See Post #59 for the reason for deletion of this Topic or Suggestion.

Religion on one side ("The Messenger"), and Censorship on the other ("Why would anyone object...").  So knock yourselves out.  You deserve each other.

The Censor has "attacked" just about everyone in this thread, and "the Messenger" is just warming up.  It's a match made in heaven, God forbid.

Let the apocalyptic metaphors fly!