14091 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I see no merit in this option. I would rather have the chess.com tech folks addressing other issues.
I want to be able to play the board, and not the person. How is that not worth some effort. It would literally be few extra lines of code not to show the rating until end - a checkbox and if statement for printing rating.
Respectfully, you need to get over (or just ignore) what the opponent is rated. I admit it has sometimes influenced my play (I've play some junk hope chess against lower rated folks) - but almost never the first game - only after the 3rd or 4th game when I "know" the person.
Will the next request be to hide the person's name in case you've played them before since that will influence how you play? Actually, such things happen in real life - master X playing master Y "knows" how master Y likes to play.
Have they done this yet? If not, I would like to know when they do.
Probably in a life time.
What if we all have a vote and bring it up to the Chess.com staff? That would be cool to have the option to hide a person's rating.
Half of you who opposed this idea say its "play the board, not the player".
There have always been two schools of thought on this. Capa was play the board, Lasker was play the player.
Lasker had quite a bit of success with this. So you cant just assume play the board is the correct option. Personally, I would definetly play the player if I had usable information.
i like this idea, not so much because it affects me directly. but because of the shear amount people that abort a game within a second of a connection being established. they see a higher rating then abort. and my blitz rating is pretty damn low. i think its more of an annoyance than anything else.
4/19/2014 - Tisdall - Lee, London 1981
by kousik_chess a few minutes ago
by brumtown 4 minutes ago
queen and pawn end game...where were my mistakes?
by LongIslandMark 5 minutes ago
Funny Chess Jokes
by kleelof 5 minutes ago
Chess traps for players below 1900 elo
by ArchdukeShrimp 9 minutes ago
Opponents chosen by the cess.com
by DoosraSathi 10 minutes ago
my mind is blown that any chess player could be below a 1300
by MarcMoulin 13 minutes ago
analyze please-draw against comp4
by VSCP_HENRIK_FETIZA10 14 minutes ago
How do you study games?
by Ronnee 14 minutes ago
Never resign! Always fight till the end!
by BSRULZ 15 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!