14169 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I see no merit in this option. I would rather have the chess.com tech folks addressing other issues.
I want to be able to play the board, and not the person. How is that not worth some effort. It would literally be few extra lines of code not to show the rating until end - a checkbox and if statement for printing rating.
Respectfully, you need to get over (or just ignore) what the opponent is rated. I admit it has sometimes influenced my play (I've play some junk hope chess against lower rated folks) - but almost never the first game - only after the 3rd or 4th game when I "know" the person.
Will the next request be to hide the person's name in case you've played them before since that will influence how you play? Actually, such things happen in real life - master X playing master Y "knows" how master Y likes to play.
Have they done this yet? If not, I would like to know when they do.
Probably in a life time.
What if we all have a vote and bring it up to the Chess.com staff? That would be cool to have the option to hide a person's rating.
Half of you who opposed this idea say its "play the board, not the player".
There have always been two schools of thought on this. Capa was play the board, Lasker was play the player.
Lasker had quite a bit of success with this. So you cant just assume play the board is the correct option. Personally, I would definetly play the player if I had usable information.
i like this idea, not so much because it affects me directly. but because of the shear amount people that abort a game within a second of a connection being established. they see a higher rating then abort. and my blitz rating is pretty damn low. i think its more of an annoyance than anything else.
"WCC Match 2014: Anand vs Carlsen - Game 9 Recap! GM Alex Yermolinsky & GM Danny Gormally"
Online versus Live ratings
by RuneTonseth a few minutes ago
Learning chess as an adult
by bgianis 2 minutes ago
Best way for an adult to get started learning chess?
by bgianis 3 minutes ago
Development of pieces
by ThrillerFan 8 minutes ago
Reproduction and Real Jaques of London Chess Set
by Fresh_from_the_Oven 8 minutes ago
Analysis needed. Thx
by Krownyh 9 minutes ago
What if the opponent doesn't cooperate?
by Veganomnomnom 10 minutes ago
by snits 11 minutes ago
billiard felts for chess pieces
by Kimbacal 12 minutes ago
How many Online Chess games are you playing
by Ziggyblitz 13 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!