16529 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
A member of my group posted this on our group forum and I wanted to pass it on. She has a good point.
Has anyone noticed that all of the member icons on Chess.com represent white males? No women, no people of color. Examples include the Online Coaching selection under the Learn menu, and the Groups & Teams, Members and Invite Friends selections under the Share menu. These are menus that you see when you go in directly through Chess.com, vs. through Facebook. I wonder what people might think of this.
p.s. Also chesskid.com
No I had not noticed. Unfortunately this game is dominated by males. Tournaments are 99% male. Things are slowly changing. Women were not encouraged to follow the sciences nor seek a career. That has totally changed. Hopefully more women will eventually learn and enjoy chess.
Why does the 'online coaching' icon have a shirt with a collar and buttons but all the other icons are wearing a t-shirt? Is that some kind of subtle attempt at indicating that coaches are of a different socio-economic class than mere players?
And why don't the icons in the drop-down menus at the top have faces? That's . . . ..that's . . . .well, I don't know what you'd call it, but that's something that I'm against, I'll tell you that much!
chess.com has icons? Blasphemous.
At least they don't spell it ikons.
This is horrible. Since those icons were obviously meant to be as realistic as possible, people are going to conclude that all of chess.com's coaches are either double-amputees or Thalidimide babies with only partially formed arms. And no faces, either!
I've always interpreted this sign to mean "Avoid extremities":
And btw isn't this juxtaposition a wee bit cruel?...
How do you suppose that fellow's head stays in position when it's not attached by anything?
Either he's wearing a Black Mass collar or he's dotted.
Okay so there's one, big deal! Probably just a token one offered up by the International White Males Society.
If you want my opinion (and of course, you don't, but let's not get into the intricacies right now), Natalia is about as real as North Dakota, and nobody is convincing me North Dakota is real. Has anyone here ever met anyone from North Dakota? Yeah, I thought not.
I always thought it was West Virginia that was the hoax state. There's only one Virginia, and that's Virginia.
There is, however, a Santa Clause, as Virginia well knows.
I think you've hit the tip of the iceberg here - take it a step further. Have you ever seen her in the same room with anyone from North Dakota? You either see one or the other, but never both - coincidence??? Think about it - who stands to gain from this situation??? Chess.com of course - also factor in the faceless, armless icons they use in their dropdown menus and you start to get the picture! I fear I've said too much already . . . .
All I know is that it's real cold. I once saw a guy from there who said it got down to 80 below! Assuming of course that he was from there (or that there is even a there to be from).
However, I do think of Natalia as being a good deal more real than North Dakota. There is however one rather peculiar facet about her though (in addition to the fact that she frequently plays chess with herself)...despite appearances, her name is not actually pronounced Po-go-NEE-nah (don't ever say it that way, or she'll get mad).
As a resident of North Dakota, I can affirm that we exist.
Can I turn off seeing my opponent's rating while playing?
by MelvinDoucet a few minutes ago
Are tactics really the way to go?
by NewArdweaden a few minutes ago
Judit Polgar would of been able to beat all male champions
by Americu a few minutes ago
5/29/2015 - Kramnik-Anand WC match 2008
by alanzhang3434 2 minutes ago
Bobby Fischer Lacked Creativity ?....How Dare Me !
by The_Ghostess_Lola 2 minutes ago
i love it when this happens (kings gambit-y like smith morra leading to legal)
by Spartycus 3 minutes ago
Stuff Non-Chess Players Say
by camberfoil 10 minutes ago
How do you deal with a pawn storm?
by Fiveofswords 17 minutes ago
Why is Stockfish making this obviously bad move?
by bb_gum234 22 minutes ago
by ilie123456 25 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!