Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Is a 1581 rating good ?


  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1

    SebLeb0210

    What do you think ?

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #2

    daddyjordan22

    Define what good is. Good in relation to all chess players, a group, family, or your own goal? What kind of rating?

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #3

    SebLeb0210

    I mean average is 1200 I think.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #4

    TheLastSupper

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #5

    SebLeb0210

    thanks thats realy cool !

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #6

    Fugazy_Crapov

    SebLeb0210 wrote:

    What do you think ?

    I think 1581 is pretty good for a 13 year old.  You have time to improve and become really good!

    Me, I'll die a contented patzer, but you can do better.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #7

    SebLeb0210

    jeez thanks ! I am 12 btw.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #9

    skakmadurinn

    Not for a grandmaster

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #10

    MSC157

    Depends on your goals. But generally speaking it's not bad at all, mate! :)

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #11

    SebLeb0210

    Thanks its better than I though.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #12

    zborg

    SebLeb0210 wrote:

    Thanks; its better than I though.

    Sorry @SebbyLeb, but your average opponents are fully 400 points below you in all three rating systems.  Clean up your act.

    NO, you're a lazy player who (chronically) plays weaker opponents.

    Set you rating range at plus and minus 150, then see what happens.  Smile

    Nice photo, in any case.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #13

    SebLeb0210

    thanks but I play people rated 2100 unrated ( not lazy bro I work my but off every day )

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #14

    zborg

    You habitually play weak computers in standard chess, too.  What's up with that?

    Sorry, but that's a complete waste of your time.

    Whatever.  Knock yourself out.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #15

    SebLeb0210

    Your unrated in online so I wouldnt talk if i wear you...

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #16

    molokombo

    he probably couldn't talk if you were to wear him.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #17

    MSC157

    molokombo wrote:

    he probably couldn't talk if you were to wear him.

    I fell out of my chair laughing. Laughing

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #18

    jfoxton

    I am a 1500ish rated player.  I enjoy learning and very competitive games so I tend to look for the 1600 and up players.  I have beaten or "tied" a few of the better rated players and have recently added the "tatics training" to my skill development to try to cure my blind spots and knowledge deficiencies.  I wouldn't do well in a timed tournament, but I am growing in my tactics and skills.  Just as there are tactical skills and playing styles in other games/sports (I am a national ranked table tennis player - just took another medal in the recent Senior Games in Cleveland, OH), training and practice make you more perfect.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #19

    SebLeb0210

    cool

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #20

    zborg

    "1600 Online" is not very strong.  Sorry.  That rating wears (sic) poorly.

    According to your game score, your average opponents are only rated 1100 in Blitz, Bullet, and Standard.  That wears (sic) rather poorly, as well.

    Johnan Hellsten's (3 new books) are definitely worth studying.  Perhaps you can get Mom to buy them for you?

    Consider posting less threads.  Improve your game instead.  You'll be a better man for it.

    Have a Nice Day. 


Back to Top

Post your reply: