Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

lol


  • 5 months ago · Quote · #101

    null-cipher

    Cryptonomicon is a horrible book.  The characters are unrealistic and awful.  The ending it is complete garbage.

  • 5 months ago · Quote · #102

    DrSpudnik

    Cryptotelecomicon?

  • 5 months ago · Quote · #103

    corrijean

    The characters are pretty much historical. Haven't found many significant deviations yet in the main characters. Turing is dead on.

  • 4 months ago · Quote · #104

    Glorfindel_1

    ivandh wrote:

    Running Windows 95 on a 2 GHz processor? That would not exactly be authentic.

    Use VMware's VM and you can limit the cpu usage to make it a little more authentic

  • 4 months ago · Quote · #105

    adamplenty

    I don't consider emulation authentic. But that's just me Smile.

  • 4 months ago · Quote · #106

    DrSpudnik

    I can fake sincerity like nobody else!

  • 4 months ago · Quote · #107

    Glorfindel_1

    adamplenty wrote:

    I don't consider emulation authentic. But that's just me .

    Yeah, I see where you are coming from, but after using a Win95 pc I much prefer a VM :P

  • 4 months ago · Quote · #108

    adamplenty

    Glorfindel_1 wrote:
    adamplenty wrote:

    I don't consider emulation authentic. But that's just me .

    Yeah, I see where you are coming from, but after using a Win95 pc I much prefer a VM :P

    I'd prefer a Win95 machine.

  • 4 months ago · Quote · #109

    Glorfindel_1

    adamplenty wrote:
    Glorfindel_1 wrote:
    adamplenty wrote:

    I don't consider emulation authentic. But that's just me .

    Yeah, I see where you are coming from, but after using a Win95 pc I much prefer a VM :P

    I'd prefer a Win95 machine.

    I have two win95 tablets :D

  • 4 months ago · Quote · #110

    adamplenty

    I's been ages since I had a proper" Win95 machine. I do have one machine that multi boots, including Windows 95, though I rarely use it. I also have another machine where I don't multi-boot technically, but I use it to run win 3.1 a lot, as you see in the beginning if this thread Smile. It "multi-boots" to Windows 98, 3.1, 3.0, 2.03, and 1.01. I put multi-boot in quotes because they all run under the same version of MS-DOS.

  • 4 months ago · Quote · #111

    Glorfindel_1

    adamplenty wrote:

    I's been ages since I had a proper" Win95 machine. I do have one machine that multi boots, including Windows 95, though I rarely use it. I also have another machine where I don't multi-boot technically, but I use it to run win 3.1 a lot, as you see in the beginning if this thread . It "multi-boots" to Windows 98, 3.1, 3.0, 2.03, and 1.01. I put multi-boot in quotes because they all run under the same version of MS-DOS.

    lol it is multi booting just like when I had three differant ubuntu versions on one pc :P

  • 4 months ago · Quote · #112

    adamplenty

    Glorfindel_1 wrote:
    adamplenty wrote:

    I's been ages since I had a proper" Win95 machine. I do have one machine that multi boots, including Windows 95, though I rarely use it. I also have another machine where I don't multi-boot technically, but I use it to run win 3.1 a lot, as you see in the beginning if this thread . It "multi-boots" to Windows 98, 3.1, 3.0, 2.03, and 1.01. I put multi-boot in quotes because they all run under the same version of MS-DOS.

    lol it is multi booting just like when I had three differant ubuntu versions on one pc :P

    On one machine, I have 8 versions of Windows! 98SE, 95, 3.2, 3.11, 3.0, 2.1, 2.03, and 1.01.

  • 4 months ago · Quote · #113

    null-cipher

    Why on earth would you have three different installs of Ubuntu on one machine?

  • 4 months ago · Quote · #114

    adamplenty

    null-cipher wrote:

    Why on earth would you have three different installs of Ubuntu on one machine?

    Proably for the same reason I have 8 versions of Windows on one machine Wink.

  • 4 months ago · Quote · #115

    Glorfindel_1

    null-cipher wrote:

    Why on earth would you have three different installs of Ubuntu on one machine?

    Some are too old to update :P

    actually I only have one OS right now and it is Slacko Puppy

    the hdd crashed...

  • 4 months ago · Quote · #116

    adamplenty

    adamplenty wrote:
    netzach wrote:

    Try windows98SE.

    Can't try SE right now. I tried the original Windows 98 with IE4, it got about halfway before it froze, and I was unable to take a screenshot .

    I finally got a chance to try it in Windows 98 SE, and it seems to load correctly in it (at least in Firefox Smile). Shall I be a daredevil and try logging on and using it in this environment? Laughing

     

  • 4 months ago · Quote · #117

    netzach

    Bravo to Mozilla for attempting to provide functional browser as that is the trickiest thing! Smile


Back to Top

Post your reply: