12294 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I have a suggestion to consider - what if in every game u had a button - "report disconnecter" ? And lets say if a person was reported 10 times you would close his account .
That's a swell idea - NOT. Just what we need, people who don't know if they're using a PC, MAC or Univac reporting everyone who gets disconnected without having a clue as to why they disconnected. BUT, I kinda like the idea of getting rid of players I don't like by just reporting them 10x - esp the ones who are currently mopping me up in turn-based games.
ok, I got a little improved idea: one must be quite sure if he reports a person. If one does many fake-reports, his reliability gets lower and so his votes owuldnt matter. Or - if someone fake-reports a lot, I'd delete his own account...
Plus at the beginning, closing the account could be manual - I mean when someone gets reported 10 times - chess.com staff would check that guy - and see whether the reports were justified and then close him.
Does one get a title if they improve their reliability rating enough?
We need no such a button for everything (when a player aborts a game, or disconnects/gets disconnected, or swears at their opponent, or ... ) is monitored automatically, i.e. by the system. Closing an account seems too harsh to me but I guess it can happen even now. Anyway, when a player breaks the Fair Play Policy their play is restricted, e.g. they have to wait 5 mins between games, they cannot abort games and so on.
You might want to see this before asking about reporting disconnectors as its not always their fault :(
Those who do do it on purpose though are auto flagged then after repeating it in other games are restricted.
I know and do really understand how frustrating it is. People come here to play, not be kept waiting for someone to make a move, more so in longer games, its really annoying.
The forums are filled with things like 'my opponent left the game one move from checkmate' or 'my opponent stopped moving in a lost position'
but then compare those with how many forum threads there are on here showing the opposite - 'i was restricted'
Its hard finding a happy medium for this as no matter what we do some are going to be pleased, angry, upset, furious ..
Problem with having a 'report this person' button on live chess is that some will abuse it and report their opponent because they feel waiting 3 minutes in a 10|0 game is too long, or some who think its funny to press the button as a joke because their opponent is a friend and they don't think of consequences. Not everyone realises there are real people (staff) who are on the receiving end of these reports.
Yes, you are right, Kohai. Nonetheless, I don`t believe that many players disconnect when they are losing their game. I may be wrong here but to do such a thing is too irrational to be frequent. Let us say I am losing badly. I can either:
Why on earth should a man choose the worst way?
... clearly you don't play much blitz! LOL ... only because it happens regularly :)
No, I don`t. I have played 13 Blitz games (and 7 of them against the Chess.com Computer-Hard) only. But I think unethical (even illegal here) behaviour has to be purpose-driven. Most of us (if not all) break some rules in our lives to GET or to AVOID something. It is possible I don`t understand people but I see no point in breaking rules to lose a game if I can do it with a single mouse click.
Boletus_CZ: it's a kinf of "revenge". When someone is losing, they want to make their opponent go through some pain of waiting.
I personally think it should be punished very hard - it's as frustrating as playing against a "computer player" - so I think that whenever it has been proved that person disconnected ON PURPOSE I suggest closing his accout (maybe even a permanent ban on his IP - but this may be too much)
It seems chess.com does a decent job, warning people first and then closing accounts.
@Boletus ... I understand your argument, but logic and reason don't necessarily apply when someone's in the midst of a moment of anger. I can't say I've never thought of doing it, but luckily my 'higher self' prevails! :)
OK guys, you made me believe it is a big deal. I can understand the anger stuff although when it happens to me I usually find a lot of not-to-be-published-here words for myself but I have never thought of punishing my opponent by wasting their time.
How to get titles like FM, IM, NM, GM
by GreedyPawnEater 4 minutes ago
Idea to dramatically raise number of paying members FAST
by blasterdragon 4 minutes ago
why is ruy lopez considered the strongest
by Fiveofswords 6 minutes ago
How many farmers have reached master level?
by GreedyPawnEater 6 minutes ago
I will gift a Diamond Membership to 1st person to solve this!
by blasterdragon 8 minutes ago
How did Magnus Carlsen defeated Garry Kasparov at age 13?
by GreedyPawnEater 10 minutes ago
Yugoslav attack vs the Pirc?
by poucin 11 minutes ago
Is it worth ruining his castle with this exchange?
by Charetter115 17 minutes ago
7/31/2015 - Slow Progression
by joupax 19 minutes ago
What is the best QGD variation for the club player as black?
by poucin 20 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!