17532 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
i have made frequent use of Tactical Trainer (T.T. hereaftr) and foundit to be very, very useful and helpful. However, notwithstanding that,I have one major complaint. That is being penalized--losing points--when I take longer to solve a problem than the program (or its author) thinks I should have taken. In a "real" chess game against a "real" opponent, I have been watching the board from the very first move; when my opponent makes a move, I am able to fit it into a context that I already know. When I begin to work on a T.T. problem,however, I am being inserted "cold" into the middle of the game. The position into which I am being thrust may be complex. It will take me ignificantly longer to get my bearings than it would if I had been present in the game from its beginning.
THEREFORE: I suggest that the point system in T.T. be modified in such a fashion that points are not subtracted from the player's total points for tardiness, if he still found the right answer. That is, if the total number of points to be gained is 15, for example, and the player takes longer to solve the problem than the author thinks he should have, such that he only gets a score of 50%, although he does still come with the right answer, he would get a zero, I think that's fine. However, if he takes enough longer to solve the problem than the author thinks he should have, such that he only gets a score of 20%, HE SHOULD NOT HAVE POINTS SUBTRACTED THAT HE HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN AWARDED, IF HE DID COME UP WITH THE RIGHT ANSWER, HOWEVER TARDILY.. This is because a major cause of his tardiness was being new to the problem's position in the first instance, and this was not the player's fault.
I would agree with you.
I also agree.
Unfortunately, since the target time is set by other players who have solved the problem being just as new to the position as you are, this is never "a major cause of [your] tardiness". The actual cause is that you're just taking twice as long to find the answer as the average person who successfully solves it cold does.
If you want an untimed rated tactics trainer, you can use Chesstempo trainer, in 'standard' mode.
ღ OFFICIAL 2014 Chess.com Awards ღ
by Doggy_Style a few minutes ago
Will ever be born a player better than Karpov?
by Stavros_34 3 minutes ago
IPad tools for creating diagrams
by farbrortheguru 5 minutes ago
12/29/2014 - Mate in 3
by Matthewjiashuli 7 minutes ago
Who is the greatest chess player of all time ?? Bobby Fischer ??
by therisand055 7 minutes ago
IF I OWN THE CENTER THAT MEANS I OWN YOU!!!
by XPLAYERJX 11 minutes ago
closed ruy? is it bad?
by imirak 19 minutes ago
question about the BAT GIRL?
by returnofxpchesser 19 minutes ago
Who is the best chess player of the whole chess history?
by squareofthepawn 20 minutes ago
Ebonized Pieces Suck...
by Mazkor 22 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!