21549 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
So why is he listed as top rated player from USA on this site with 2700 rating if he hasn't moved a piece over here?
Maybe he's busy?
may be the 90 day criterion applied to his games..(during non premium days)
Maybe he's rated OTB 2700? That shouldn't make a difference anyways.
based on what?
how these guys play blindfold... cant even imagine
How did he get a 1280 rating here? They used to start everyone off at 1200 but now i think new players are listed as unrated.
it is to be construed as the the average rating for all users with country listed "United States"
say one guy is 2700 on top and 1000 players 990 rated will give an average of 991
I meant to say, why is he listed as top rated player from USA with 2700 rating in online chess when he hasn't played a single online game. Why not put someone who has actually played on this site and got rating?
You'll note that the rating is in parentheses, which is just a guesstimate of a rating based on his USCF or FIDE rating. So for a chess.com rating, it should be about 3000.
Still, what's really disturbing is that the average US player on chess.com is rated 1280!!
Topalov was not world champion... classical only please...
Imho the policy of assigning titled players certain ratings upon registering is arguable, because:
a) FIDE ratings and Chess.com ratings are different
b) Correspondence chess and otb chess are different
c) The numbers assigned are pretty random. I think I got 2200 as a start; my second (a strong IM) was graded 2000. Then some people actually get confused and start asking: "Is it true that some amateur who has 2800 Chess.com rating is a better player than you"?
i remember reading somewhere in chess.com itself a computation/ratio of converting USCF rating to chess.com.. May be such a formulae exists for FIDE too.. but i am not sure..
He has another account
He should play speed chess against GMs!
[oh wait, he does!]
"Titled Tuesday EARLY EVENT! Host IM Danny Rensch"
by Adam-Herwis a few minutes ago
12/1/2015 - Kosolapov - Nezhmetdinov, Kazan 1936
by alkhthesec 5 minutes ago
Is Stonewall a great defense?
by Polar_Bear 6 minutes ago
Auto-resign rule means I cant enjoy chess anymore
by ilmaven 8 minutes ago
how to block someone
by Chief-Mouser 11 minutes ago
by joewinall 14 minutes ago
If there were no computers what
by Chief-Mouser 15 minutes ago
BULLET ZONE: The Miracle of APRIANTO's Opening
by You-Run 20 minutes ago
My quickest win
by petrikeckman 23 minutes ago
Danish Gambit (with 3...D3!)
by yureesystem 23 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!