6714 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
SanDiegoDreaming
During tournament play, it would be nice if groups could have their winners declared, even though there are ongoing games in the group, if those games have no further relevance (players cannot get to an advancing position or the game isn't needed for a tie-break situation). The the tournament could move on to the next round while players that don't advance can finish their games without impeding the tournament.
Even if this was not an automatic function, maybe to many variables to make it an easy, it would be awesome as a tool available to the Tournament Director.
LAexpress12
so, basically u can show off to ur group members that you won?
I was referring to the tournament group, so that the next round can start instead of waiting on a couple of games being played by people no longer with a shot of moving on.
For example, I am the TD of a tournament that started six months ago. We are now waiting on a game that just started (last I checked, white had made their first move, waiting on black). Neither player will move on if they win, and the person in that grouping is clear (there are no tie break issues). In my scenario, the tournament could move on to round 2 (maybe even a couple of months ago) and the remaining game can still be played. As it stands, if the game proceeds at the same pace as the previous one, we are looking at mid 2011 before the next round starts.
II-Oliveira
Sounds fair enough.
TadDude
Appears to be too complicated to implement.
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/tournaments/how-to-speed-up-tournaments---help
The one game after another format can only increase this frustration. Instead make the groups smaller and play both games at once.
You know I searched for the topic and didn't find anything. I didn't use speed up as a reference, I wonder if that is where I went wrong.
Thanks for posting the link, TadDude.
5/20/2012 - Mate in 3
by stm01 a few minutes ago
The 2012 World Championship of Chess!
by trysts a few minutes ago
5/26/2012 - Ragozin - Veresov, Moscow 1945
by K279 6 minutes ago
Playing a Symetrical London System
by pfren 7 minutes ago
iPad App
by blackstarzes 7 minutes ago
Wanna Play?
by top2pr 10 minutes ago
Sharing your repertoire, good or bad?
by Estragon 21 minutes ago
Welcome to the Tournaments Discussion Forum
by gunzzzy 30 minutes ago
Interesting game. Please help.
by Escapest_Pawn 38 minutes ago
which opening is better? Traxler or Double Muzio gambit?
by alexlaw 42 minutes ago