10606 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
@AKAL1: Thanks very much for analyzing that game and I really appreciate your comments. The main reason that I wanted to avoid the Queen trade on move 9 was because (as I saw it) it would have given me a Berlin Wall type pawn structure weakness, but without the Bishop pair to compensate. Although I agree that the lines in your analysis don't look too bad for Black. Also, I wanted to play aggressively and put him under some pressure in the middlegame - I didn't want to trade down to an endgame too soon.
It's an interesting move, but I'm not sure I agree with your analysis after 16.b4!? I think 18.0-0 would be a mistake:
19..Bb3 would definitely have been a very good move, and I like your idea of attacking d3 - that would have put White under a lot of pressure.
Regarding the endgame, I think this has been a good lesson for me in just how complex King & Pawn endgames can be and how you should be very careful before trading down to them. Out of interest, Stockfish's refutation of 32..exf5 is rather brilliant. I can't resist posting it as a puzzle, but bear in mind this is not my analysis! There's no way in a squillion years I would ever have seen this during a game! :
lol the pawn ending..
Maybe I should revise my statement: feel free to trade into a pawn ending if you are a computer! I thought my analysis was pretty sound, but knew there was a refutation. IM Silman actually worte in one of his books about how he saw a pawn endgame, got into correspondence with a few GMs, and it took them six months to find the correct result of the ending.
My point with the comment about exchanging queens is that endgames/middlegames can still be very exciting. Exchanging queens does not have to mean that the game is a draw, even if the position looks equal.
On 18. 0-0, of course I had to put a blunder in my analysis (read the coment I posted just before the analysis :)
I live in chicago and yeah theres not alot of tournment options around, Time4tea you play at the Mcdonalds at foster and western? anyways iv been reading your post and glad to see your progress! I too want to start playing OTB. i have a small chess group, since there really no clubs in chicago, but i want more, where did you register online or? Im ready to get beaten by 10 year olds! im 30 lol.
Hi Scannerman, no I haven't played at the McDonalds at foster & western. Do people play Chess there? I found out about the tourneys on the USCF website. They usually have a link to the tourney page where you can sign up, but you need to be a USCF member first (you can sign up online). So, you haven't played in an OTB tourney at all?
Wow - that's a very eye-opening anecdote! I saw another thread on here where someone asked what the most complex type of endgame is and IM pfren said it's without a doubt King & pawn. I'm starting to understand better what he meant by that. I'll make a note in future to only trade down to a pawn ending if I'm absolutely sure it's good for me, or if I'm in a bad situation anyway and want to create complications to try to force a mistake
I certainly take your point that trading Queens early isn't always dull and drawish - there is usually a lot of play to be had in a Queenless middlegame. I actually like the endgame a lot and tbh I usually feel more comfortable there than in the opening/middlegame. Not in that particular one though!
Hey, yeah there a few guys that play there from time to time, from my observation they range from about 1500 to 2000, theres a older guy there thats about 2000. I play OTB but not in a serious tourney setting. I want to so thats why i try to stay fresh with OTB just in case i take the plunge. I think i take chess a lil more seriously then the rest in my group and i can see im slowly starting to get the upper hand on them cuz of my studying and practice. We play with a clock but i hanvt gotten to the point where i record the moves which i think i will start very soon. There only One chess club in my area and thats Touch Move but i always get a wierd vibe from there. how do you practice? or do you just study lines? or do you just play yourself?
Do Americans tend to flame more on live chess
by Pulpofeira 2 minutes ago
1/29/2015 - White Wins
by Moab2021 5 minutes ago
Please Start Enforcing Restrictions on Those who Abandon Games
by chester6 18 minutes ago
by jiriborc 40 minutes ago
Pieces do not move
by lazizbek0307 46 minutes ago
Podium Prediction Chess (PPC) - "GRENKE CHESS CLASSIC 2015" Edition
by Louis-Gaetan 48 minutes ago
What is winning on time? NOOB
by chessarx 52 minutes ago
1/28/2015 - Horvath vs. Lajos Mayer, Budapest, 1917
by NateTimms 66 minutes ago
What percentage of chess is tactics
by leiph18 82 minutes ago
Rules re Asking for Resignation
by December_TwentyNine 86 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!