11102 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I posted in it so you would see it. A joke that's not funny.
Everyone I picked has lost, johyoudell. After the next three tie-break matches are decided, I'll probably jinx two more innocent people
The Monster has me blocked
Is he right?
About the tournament being a joke to him? It's his opinion. I find it highly entertaining, myself. An 1800 played Yifan Hou in the first round, but that's because they limited the number of women from strong chess playing countries like China and Russia in order to be more globally represented.
I'm not excited about the format of the tournament. Too much randomness because of the short matches. Why do they make the gals play this way?
... or maybe I'm just p*ssed because I was rooting for Lahno
One of the commentators at the WWCC website, Alexandr Khalifman, actually won the world chess championship in 1999 using the same format(w/ more players). He was quoted at the time: "Rating systems work perfectly for players who play only in round robin closed events. I think most of them are overrated. Organizers invite same people over and over because they have the same rating and their rating stays high".
The Khalifman quote is here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Khalifman
where is the monster?
I guess FIDE never learns. There was a World Championship for men with a similar format, and the results were equally random.
If the goal is to create a different champion every cycle, this is a good way to achieve that goal.
I always thought the goal of a world championship is to crown the best player. This system doesn't do that.
Why does it work with tennis but not chess? Is it simply the number of games per round?
In tennis, there is no single world champion. There are Grand Slam events, and a highest rated player, but not a world championship the way there is in chess.
I'm comparing this tournament with a single major.
There is nothing fundamental about an elimination tournament that makes it random.
This is what Jeff Sonas, the statistician, wrote:
Well, what's wrong with the knockout format? Easy: with so many participants, and so little time, there is just not enough room to identify the single strongest player in the field. It is very easy for the strongest player to falter in one game and suddenly become eliminated. We expect that an effective championship cycle will allow the strongest player (whoever that might be) a real chance to demonstrate their superiority by winning the cycle, and this clearly isn't the case when a minus-one score over a stretch of two games can eliminate you from the whole cycle, however much success you had in the previous games during the tournament. Thus a knockout tournament should not be the final championship event, merely a preliminary qualifying event. ...
The difference with tennis is that the best players have a much higher winning percentage.
there aren't many draws in tennis
I believe it was Monster with no name.
you shouldn't really take seriously what is written by a monster that hasn't got a name, checkmating skills, logic, plus way too many other things to list.
Stuff I wanted to know about cheaters
by 11qq11 2 minutes ago
Strange French/Sicilian Defenses
by TwoMove 3 minutes ago
Trouble converting against higher rated players
by jurassicmark 5 minutes ago
Please Analyse My Game
by 11qq11 6 minutes ago
5/30/2015 - Full Out Assault
by csubhadip75 7 minutes ago
Grünfeld defence books?
by TwoMove 7 minutes ago
Reproduction and Real Jaques of London Chess Set
by GM4U 14 minutes ago
Mate in 6. Masters only! :D
by lordkevinus 19 minutes ago
Nice tactical detail
Moving two pawns in the opening
by jurassicmark 29 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!