7403 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Bubatz
I just accidentally found out that I don't know how to win a pawnless endgame where I have 2 rooks and the opponent 1 rook. It should be a trivial win, but playing against the computer I didn't seem to make progress after 20 moves. At first I thought there should be a method where I can force exchanging one rook and convert the game into a basic checkmate K&R vs K. But try as I might, the computer didn't let me. Then I thought I would just checkmate him with my two rooks - he always interfered either with his king attacking one of my rooks or giving me check with his rook. My third idea was to checkmate him with one rook while the other rook was shielding me from his checks. This worked to a degree, but I couldn't get him down to the first rank.
So please can an someone either shoot me or show me how to win this? It must be trivial because it's covered neither in Silman's nor Dvoretsky's endgame book.
Jupp53
Post a pgn-file of your trial and I will try it.
Ok, for the above diagram, Fritz gives the following solution:
If anybody knows the general strategy/technique for these K+2R vs. K+R-endgames, please post! The posting above gave just the computer aided solution for one example and I can't see how this can be transfered to other such situations.
It seems there's not much traffic here anyway - maybe I should post my question in one of the general forums?
Liburkin
Can I always force an exchange of rooks in that type of endgame? What's with the checks he's able to give along the way?
There's a simple method. Hide your king behind behind one of the rooks. If both rooks are at the border approach the chess giving rook with your king till you attack the unprotected rook. Use the won move to activate the first rook.
Try to work out the rest for yourself. If you don't progress show your problem here with some lines.
Thanks, indeed I had tried something like that before when I tried to checkmate him (my third idea in the original post), but it didn't work. Probably I had done something wrong at some point. I'll try again and if it doesn't work out I'll post again.
diogens
I annotated a pgn with some ideas:
Thanks friend, this was extremely helpful! It now seems to me that the correct method is the following:
Try to setup checkmate with the normal "ladder" technique, switching the rooks to the opposite side if he attack with his king. In addition if he checks your king with his rook, go hiding behind one of your own rooks. At one point he will be forced to intervene with his rook, leading to the desired "forced exchange" and conversion into a trivial K+R vs. K endgame.
In retrospect, the main problem was how to bring about the desired forced exchange. The answer to this now seems to be "by just trying to mate him the usual way".
Is there still something else to consider?
@Bubatz: well done comment imo.
Endgame puzzle from my game
by Martin0 4 weeks ago
endgame puzzle
by nimzovich 6 weeks ago
Endgame tourneys?
by CRSMN 2 months ago
R + P vs R, with Pawn on the Rook's File
by Black__Knight 3 months ago
K&2R vs.K&R- Help!
by Jupp53 3 months ago
Interesting Position
by diogens 4 months ago
rooks or bishops which is harder ???
by Liburkin 4 months ago
Knight endgame study
by nimzovich 5 months ago
Endgame books
by chessrube 5 months ago
Bishop + Rook V Rook
by diogens 6 months ago
Endgame Lovers