Up to 12:00 Dec 21 (Hongkong time)

Below is the most winner of Team China 以下是中国队的常胜将军

Tell me if you find the error, for it is updated manually.

因是手工更新，如有错误请指正。

12 wins: Panmumu,

11 wins: blackfaced,

9 wins: aniuj,

6 wins: xlc,cnwlwzj,xiangqi,song98,DoubleC,

5 wins:  caliche616,

4 wins: Yu_Tiancheng,straycat,

3 wins:lysander1,wxhbrdy,takodori,jootoo,rogerwang,

2 Wins:

snow8261,wbtcpc,tangloky,Williamking, ylu2003,papergod,ChessCommander ,Shaefirn , josephw0601,tambok_O10,

1 Wins:

ADingbat,Redstrike,d4d5c4dxc4,rakiem,hailaer,klhn444,kosin,

master12345612345,chiccogiancarlo,

I am not so strong but won 3, LOL

12 wins, nice job panmumu!

congrats  panmumu!

 What do you mean by congrats?

because panmumu won 12 games, the most winner.

he means congratulations :P

I wonder the statistic of winning is from where,for instance,it shows the winning in team match or personal games or other games?

it comes from the team match of our team only, exclude vote chess and your own games.

and I will update it after several months, and just based on the matches completed.

now I count them based on all matches on going & completed, it is easily make the mistake and spend too much time.

perhaps i`ll try to sneak up on this chart by playing & winning more games but i never take on much lower rated opponents but confident of my chances of grabbing the top position withen the year if we keep getting challenges !!

thanks, straycat, we will avoid the match of whole team vs whole team in future, but break it into multi divisions based on rating, it could be more fair and we have more chance to win.

yes, Panmumu is right, if you play the opponent has the rating near you, both parties has more chance to win, and if that players is 1200, there is a great chance that she / he is a strong player but just join chess.com

any way, the breaking could avoid the big gap, I mean you need to face a 300-500 or even more higher player.

we will still keep a few matches for whole team vs whole team.

but that is the only way we can win against prestigous super big team ! ;-) , i think we should take on the whole team matches at least against teams with big number of players like some of the ones we are playing now allready! and against small teams we could send players of close ratings to play them.

I thought the same issue these days, if we face the big or smaller team with our whole team, there are great chance to be a murder - one side sent 10 players with rating 1800+ or 2000+,and another team has 2-3 players 1800+ only, all others are 1000-1800.

just now somebody post a topic to talk this, see:

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/community/the-most-unbalanced-team-match-ever

i think our team players have a good chance to improve their ratings !, if they keep play united in a competitive pridfull team spiritand the lower rated members can perhaps look for guidance and inspiration from other members if they feel their game is not improving well enough.

You forgot me 2 wins, both of them were time-outs, so not something to be proud of.

hey i won 1

what competitions r u guys talking about?

you guys HAVE TO  brush up on your English. i mean "most winner of team china" is supposed to be "member with most wins for team china", and even that doesn't translate into 中国队的常胜将军.

 the translation is flexible, 中国队的常胜将军 is just a phrase with the same meaning, since there isn't that much of an accuracy needed in the translation of our post.