This is a study plan I am planning on doing and wanted to know if it's solid.

8 puzzles from chessproblem.com

5 puzzles each from 303 tricky chess series (books)

6 puzzles from the chess tactics workbook (book)

3 puzzles from chess.com's tactics trainer

10 endgame puzzles with 2 being composed

3-4 puzzls from how to beat your dad at chess (book)

4 puzzles on chessemrald (website)

8 puzzles from chesstempo (website)

7 puzzles from ideachess (website)

5-6 puzzles from 1001brilliant checkmate's (book)

20 puzzles from my own games (won,draw or loss)

1 puzzle from chessgames.com (puzzle of the day)

1 puzzle from chess.com (daily puzzle)

11 puzzles from 600 practical chess exercises (book) 

= 96 total puzzles + 4 puzzles from other peoples games who are in my same rating class 

All this will be done in 2-3hrs coming back to one's I missed.

Most of the sites are very good at their tactic problems, wow, what a plan!

And... this is on a daily base? At the long term, this can be exhausting, but if you can, you've done yourself a great pleasure, which can be used your entire life ;)

thankyou dekker the only concern I have is  the last one with looking at tactics played in others games at my level should there be more ?

I'm afraid my English is too bad to understand you :-) 
Do you mean:
- If trying tactics played in games with similar ratings - to yours - is enough? (No)
- If only trying tactics is enough to improve (Yes, but it's better to try and understand positional games as well, to improve those skills, for example trying to understand games played by Kramnik) 
- Something totally different? :P 

no thats fine thanks.