Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Super Admins


Admins


Libertarian Chess

  • EVERYWHERE International 
  • Formed: Feb 28, 2009
  • Liberty is universal and it speaks to the hearts of people rich, old, young, poor, and everywhere in between. If you believe in the right of self-ownership and personal choice then this is the group for you. Lets bring liberty to the masses and educate ALL..

Join Chess.com for free to post here! Already a member? Then login now!
  • From what I recall the "rules" say that, but that view is - according to the video anyways - not in line with the fundamentals of law, so say the lawyers in question...

    by Tao999 15 hours ago

  • Once a month I hear about Paul's supporters infiltrating the delegate-selection process, but my understanding is that they are party-rule-bound to vote in the first round per the consequences of the primary. If it goes to a second round, all delegates are unbound and a Harding/Eisenhower situation may unfold. This is the first I've heard of U.S. law governing political party rules regarding delegates.

    by KlangenFarben 15 hours ago

  • the site is breaking links, the ​vid says that all GOP​delegates can vote their​ conscience under US law.

    by Tao999 20 hours ago

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?​v=SkNO90HPaw0 :vid title​"Ron Paul: Lawyers​Confirm All Delegates Are​Unbound!"

    by Tao999 20 hours ago

  • WCC Kasparov has had, since childhood, some serious peronsal issues that derail politics but not talent nor fame. WCC RJF shared some of those traits as well.

    by KlangenFarben 2 days ago

  • Fischer is like my eternal chess hero. He was a rebel and was not easily swayed by any point of view. He is like the John Wayne of chess. I think geniuses are prone to hypotheses that are not easily accepted by peasants. I was so hoping Kasparov would have won the presidency when he ran. I think that would have done great things for chess and for Russian/US relations.

    by viannagambit 2 days ago

  • Some of the upper-echelon commentators immediately seized upon the specific move. It did not gain traction as Kasparov has pronounced nearly as many nutjob opinions as Fischer.

    by KlangenFarben 2 days ago

  • It was a very tragic loss. It wasn't fair because a machine has no trepidation and has vastly greater calculative ability. I knew that if a genius like Kasparov was suspicious about human intervention that there was something to it.

    by viannagambit 2 days ago

  • Game 2 definitely demonstrated​interference by then-IM JB (I​won't give him the​satisfaction of being named,​and he is certainly no James​Brown). There is a particular​point around move 19-23 where​the brute-force​parallel-programming RS-232​should have by all means​demanded a certain move but​intervention certainly​occurred. Garri played well​but missed the easy draw in​game two and melted down,​resigned in less than a real​hour, in game 6 playing the​Caro-Kann which I had never​seen him do,

    by KlangenFarben 3 days ago

  • I'll comment on the 1997 Kasparov-IBM match another time. I attended game five. At the time, I made what is now called a blog about it. I have many strong statements in my holster regarding that match.

    by KlangenFarben 3 days ago