Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Super Admins


MirkoBabic

  • International 
  • Formed: Jun 4, 2009
  • Welcome! Our group ,,Mirko Babic" is for the all people in our world! If You do a wish to be famous player, please join our group. By chess in our group we have pretty sweet time. If You do a question more, we try to solve Your problem. We are playing team matches and ,,vote chess". Please photos in photo section friendly. Thank You very much for membership and playing. Gold, superadmin

Join Chess.com for free to post here! Already a member? Then login now!
  • sp is right

    by ilovesandstone15 2 weeks ago

  • The only true grading that i will accept is a ICCF grading other chess site tend to over grade players

    by dracula1939 3 weeks ago

  • Wikipedia is enough for 'proof'..

    by StrategicPlay 3 weeks ago

  • proof is difficult to find but when u find good proof, stick to it. and i can almost never ever ever ever ever find it.

    by ilovesandstone15 3 weeks ago

  • Yes but some people may call themselves 'chess maters' but they may be frauds so it's good to check other websites for proof

    by Faithy911 3 weeks ago

  • Wikipedia itself is written and edited by people from all fields. Even Chess masters would have written articles. So you cannot really doubt the knowledge of Wiki.

    by StrategicPlay 3 weeks ago

  • i mean, when u go in there, there's about a million pages worth of info. that kinda gives away that it's a little.... well u get the idea

    by ilovesandstone15 3 weeks ago

  • Agreed but some of it is just plain lies

    by Faithy911 3 weeks ago

  • wikipedia is ok but majority of it can be far fetched

    by ilovesandstone15 3 weeks ago

  • do not trust that wikipedia link they don't know anything about chess

    by vibhav_king 3 weeks ago