Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

1st Chess.com Master Marathon!

Submitted by SonofPearl on Tue, 01/10/2012 at 11:39am.

From the Webmaster!

Yes, indeed! ALL members are invited to join us Wednesday morning (10 am Pacific) for the ultimate showdown: a thrilling non-stop marathon of bullet-chess stamina!

Blunders will certainly NOT be "pardoned" as our two sometimes-friendly Directors of Content, International Masters David Pruess & Daniel Rensch go head-to-head for three dizzying hours of lightning-fast chess with a $1000 prize on the line!

 

angryknights.png

 

Observe their games in real time on the Live Chess server, with up-to-the-second info on how many games each player has won so far!!

At the same time, see the stress on their faces and hear all the banter on Chess.comTV!

Rumor even has it that live-chess/Support celebrity KOHAI will be on hand to ensure everything remains fair - and to break up any physical altercations between our two spirited combatants!

Don't miss this one, folks! It's going to be an amazing show!!

« Previous | 1 2 3 | Next »

Comments:

by MagnusM - 41 days ago
Vilnius Lithuania
Member Since: Jul 2011
Member Points: 594

I saw the first five games and understood rench was going to win. He is a lot better at one minute games. Pruess often got a better position and lost because of time trouble

by Arch-Man - 41 days ago
Philadelphia, Pa. United States
Member Since: Jun 2011
Member Points: 101

Daniel Rensch

by alexlaw - 41 days ago
Hong Kong
Member Since: Feb 2010
Member Points: 125

WHO WON!???

someone please tell me!

by PhilipN - 42 days ago
Oregon United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 1107

I hadn't read these posts when I stopped in about 50 games into the match...now I understand why someone was something-point-five points ahead.

Someone at Chess.com had a sense of humor:)

by bigbikefan - 42 days ago
Pago Pago
Member Since: Apr 2011
Member Points: 20

At $180+/hr this is nothing to sneeze at for most people, and it doesn't matter, whether it's a regular ("proper"?) game, or a bunch of blitz games, or a gazillion of "bullets"...

by sheardp - 42 days ago
London United Kingdom
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 478

I will bet Chuck Norris could go 0.5 ahead in a match, but he probably would not.

by SonofPearl - 42 days ago
Wales
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 11982

The match has started! Cool

by MagnusM - 42 days ago
Vilnius Lithuania
Member Since: Jul 2011
Member Points: 594

Why not play one proper game or two decent ones?

by GM Shankland - 42 days ago
Bay Area, CA United States
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 104

It's half an hour before the match, and I shall now make my prediction:

David shall eke out Danny by a 4 game margin after 3 grueling hours of play that will go all the way down to the wire, producing exactly 97 games.

by Shazomei - 42 days ago
United Kingdom
Member Since: Apr 2010
Member Points: 47

@FMKaydenTroff

I'm not entirely sure that it's not an impossibility... unless the programmers have detected some bad code and put it right or it is indeed intentional. I know in some of the matches I've watched, some players have taken a 0.5 point lead in a match; maybe if there's a draw due to insufficient material that would otherwise be a loss on time?...

by FM KaydenTroff - 42 days ago
Utah United States
Member Since: Dec 2009
Member Points: 494

@Shazomei

Interesting comment, but one thing I would like to point out is that your example of someone getting a +1.5 lead is impossible as they are playing each other.  The only way to get 1.5 is to draw a game, but if one gets a draw the other one does also so +.5 can't quite happen.  But your other logic I would guess depends on what they want, like if they want the money, or if they just want to make it a good show, or if they want to stick to Chess Respect and resign when they are losing.

by pattrik - 42 days ago
Somewhere in Canada
Member Since: Apr 2010
Member Points: 3700

:D this is goingto be good.

by Shazomei - 42 days ago
United Kingdom
Member Since: Apr 2010
Member Points: 47

I'm curious on match strategy too. For example, if one player gets (for example) a 5 win lead with only 20 minutes to go, will they make the other player on course for a redeeming victory play the game out to checkmate to draw out time?

More curiously, does it benefit the player with a lead at any point to make the other play the game out to checkmate? (with it being 1_1 time controls, there is potential to win every game with a significant material advantage and to not lose on time - but that doesn't stop the players of finding delays within the overall match time)

I would probably hazard a guess that this strategy only becomes psychologically useful if one of the players can gain a 1.5+ point lead. Once you get that kind of a lead, you want to be thinking about winning the match and drawing it out, because even with a loss, you remain a clear 0.5+ points ahead...

Anyone want to proffer any other potential match strategies or psychological strategies? :)

by ChessMarkstheSpot - 42 days ago
Westwood, N.J. United States
Member Since: Jul 2010
Member Points: 5201

   90 minutes away folks!  Get ready for some chaos. I have Chessbase 11 ready to start some organization and my post-event wrap-up blog and the entire match will be uploaded to the Database of Games section here on Chess.com.

   -Mark

by SonofPearl - 42 days ago
Wales
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 11982
by Scarlet_chessmaster - 42 days ago
International International
Member Since: Oct 2011
Member Points: 1320

is it today?wednesday 11th 2012?

by kohai - 42 days ago
Chess.com International
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 10915

Hahaha, yeah I'm here in America with the guys and will be around when they play later this morning.

by FM KaydenTroff - 42 days ago
Utah United States
Member Since: Dec 2009
Member Points: 494

Can I call winner!?

by Shazomei - 42 days ago
United Kingdom
Member Since: Apr 2010
Member Points: 47

I think the big G will win this one. He's had an excellent performance at the North California International, and despite them not getting paired at the tournament so David could claim his first psychological victory like he claimed he would in Pardon Our Blunders; I have to admit, I've not seen news about David playing anywhere recently (outside of Fremont); and he's not been submitting content for video lectures for some time. For whatever reason, I don't think he's been keeping up with his theory and study as much as Danny in recent weeks, and I think he's less prepared for it. I wouldn't be surprised if Danny has been doing some King's Gambit preparation as well. :P

(On a side note: does anyone know if 6/9 would've been good enough for a GM norm for Danny, if the tournament didn't have the problem they had with the foreign players rule?)

by NostalgicComplex - 42 days ago
A Figment of your imagination, Singapore Singapore
Member Since: Jun 2011
Member Points: 11

This'll be close.

« Previous | 1 2 3 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.