Anand Beats Karpov 3.5-0.5

Submitted by SonofPearl on Mon, 11/02/2009 at 11:04am.

On the second day of their rapid match, Vishy Anand (pictured) comfortably won both games against former champion Anatoly Karpov, to emerge the victor by 3.5-0.5.

No-one doubts the heart and passion that the great Anatoly Karpov has for chess, but it seems that his advancing years and the limited amount of time he can now give to the game, are seriously affecting his practical playing strength.

After heavy defeats to Kasparov and Anand in recent events, not to mention some below par tournament performances, perhaps it's time for Karpov to retire gracefully.  He was one of the greatest champions in history in his day, and has nothing left to prove to anyone.

Just as no-one likes to see a boxer fighting on well past his prime, no chess fans want to see Karpov become a punchbag for average GM's who he would have crushed easily back in the 1970's, 80's and 90's. (I'm not suggesting Kasparov and Anand are average GM's, of course! Smile)

 

 

« Previous | 1 2 3 4 | Next »

Comments:

by hwatuseke - 13 days ago
Jakarta Indonesia
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 875

I agreed with arguments or comments from the brothers 'Aliaran ookamo' but I need to add Anatoly Kasparov is a generous man and very human why because he realized that to win to maintain his hold was not good, it would be better to give chance to others who want to and to equate and appropriate perestasi GM Vishy Anand is for him to get. I saw it from every game if anyone wants a discussion with Anatoli Kasparov  he was always willing to explain the reality that I met on the internet and now Anatoly Kasparov  play again and willing to share his knowledge through Facebook so Facebook users in Indonesia is a lot of others and many are also accessible memalui facebook. sekses for Vishy Anand and Anatoly Kasparov successfully created as usual for bitter melon likes winning and losing him to play again heheee. are distributed through Facebook.

by Aliaran_ookamo - 14 days ago
Utica, Newyork United States
Member Since: Nov 2009
Member Points: 1

            After reading some of the comments regarding Karpov getting crushed by Anand I just wanted to add that after being world champ for as long as he was, becoming a billionaire, playing every player in the world of note...maybe Karpov continues to play chess when already past his prime because it's fun. Out of all the silly games in the world that anyone could become addicted to, chess is the one game that rules above all and oh boy win or lose it sure is fun.

by mariaclara - 16 days ago
manila Philippines
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 71

Karpov is the richest chess grandmaster and world champion ever.

He is  twice a  billionaire. He made really good  than all your world champions combined.

I believe that now Karpov plays chess for fun and for charity.

What Money Can't Buy

By BORIS GULKO and GABRIEL SCHOENFELD
July 27, 2007

The Dutch magazine, New In Chess, recently reported that Petromir, a Russian energy company, owns a tract of Siberia with 43 trillion cubic meters of natural gas underneath it. What does that fact have to with chess?

The answer is that Petromir is solely owned by one Anatoly Karpov, former chess champion of the world. Karpov is now a wealthy man, worth approximately $2 billion......

Please see this for the complete article..

http://susanpolgar.blogspot.com/2007/07/billionaire-world-champion.html

by kunduk - 17 days ago
kolkata India
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 853

great going, ANAND.. keep it up..

by tanmay_chakrabarti - 18 days ago
Uttarpara India
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 998

Good coverage.

by Dalorzo - 18 days ago
Costa Rica
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 4

Chess and Boxing I think was very appropiate analogy, thats what it is. The author explained very well his analogy by saying "no-one likes to see a boxer fighting on well past his prime", the analogy doesn't go further than that.

It has to be really hard for Karpov to quit chess, especially because inside he might feel he can do better.

I have a lot of respect for Karpov not giving up yet but I think if he still wants to keep playing he should try some lower rated players to get in shape, and then play top rated players.

Another thing we have to take into account is that it was Anand who Karpov was playing even the great Kramnik scored really bad agaisnt Anand in the World Chess Championship(two different type of games) but it says a lot about Anand and not exactly his opponents being bad players.

by Skand - 19 days ago
Live in Dubai, UAE - But I am from India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 155

Comparing chess matches with boxing matches is not appropriate. In boxing a mis-match can result in fatality.

Chess should be compared to games like bridge, golf etc, where the grand old men continue to play matches and tournaments till they get invited and get a kick out of playing the sport they love.

by CodenameAdidas - 19 days ago
Catbalogan Samar Philippines
Member Since: Oct 2009
Member Points: 11

No Clock Karpov Wil WIn. give karpov 20 Mintz Anand Will put down 100 percent. Karpov is older. Anand is not older.

 

I Go Karpov if match got 20 mintz. Anand will never WIn

by tewodros_yifredew - 19 days ago
Tel aviv Israel
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 11

HI ALL

Can someone post a link for live games for the Tal Memorial. 

It is going to be a really exciting tournament!

Please Hurry it starts at 12:00 GMT!!!!!

Cry

by b4ndit - 19 days ago
Herning Denmark
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 14

 Respect the elders !

 Karpov is a superior GM and a match even for Kasparov, and his presence at a tournament will draw a crowd, just to see him, he doesnt even have to play !

 Respect this man and the knowledge he persists, he is a idol for many many players and his games have helped Anand and 1000's of others to improve.

 If he retires, it should be because he wants to, i find it offending to even suggest such a retirement from anyone but himself !

 I have also heard this about Bent Larsen, he should retire because he got beat, where does this lack of respect come from, how can you suggest that these grand old men dont belong on the chessscene ?!

 He was playing the world champion, for gods sake !!!

by forrie - 19 days ago
Vanderbijlpark South Africa
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 434

by hsbgowd:

"by demetrios18 - 12 hours ago
new york United States

Congrads to Anad for winning games without checkmate or forced mate. If there was no clock Karpov would not lose and is a much better player than Anand. Karpov is old and he think a little slower plus he is a little slower picking up the pieces and moving them.  Anand would get more respect if he actually won with great mates or forced mate in 5 forcing Karpov to resign but it did not happen here.
 
Does the guy who made the above comment know chess?"
 
 
Dont be too hard on Demetrios, he lives in his own world and often make comments like these. But his comments are always funny to read e.g. in the above comment" "he (karpov) is a little slower picking up the pieces and moving them" - I mean that is very funny!
by steamroller82 - 19 days ago
Madison, WI United States
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 12

look at the games. it's not as if karpov played horrible chess. people need to give karpov a break. after all, there is no shame in getting mauled by anand in a rapid match.

by hsbgowd - 19 days ago
Alabama United States
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 39

by demetrios18 - 12 hours ago
new york United States

Congrads to Anad for winning games without checkmate or forced mate. If there was no clock Karpov would not lose and is a much better player than Anand. Karpov is old and he think a little slower plus he is a little slower picking up the pieces and moving them.  Anand would get more respect if he actually won with great mates or forced mate in 5 forcing Karpov to resign but it did not happen here.
 
Does the guy who made the above comment know chess?
by kfan - 19 days ago
Kathmandu Nepal
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 5

Well done Anand!

Also show respect to Karpov, who is still playing at the highest level!

by alestor - 19 days ago
United States
Member Since: Oct 2009
Member Points: 2

players nowadays are certainly better in chess than they used to be. in every sport the average player has vastly improved over the last 20 years due to superior training and a higher population pool. kasparov is like the michael jordan of chess and is probably better than players nowadays, but i guarantee that anyone in the top 10 in chess is better than karpov in his prime.

by DJHeilke - 19 days ago
United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 46

Hey Evison,

In second game it is deeper than just the two pieces for the rook.  White's queen is isolated and his king safety is a problem.

After 33. Rxf2 Qxg3 black's chief threat is ...Qc3, followed by ...Ba5+.  It's tough to see a line for white to prevent this.  34. Qd2 loses the b and a pawns, while 34. Rg2 has problems after 34...Qf3+ and then eventually ...Kh8 and ...Be4.  Add to this the fact that white has no avenue for attack, and it is easy to see why any GM would resign, clock or no clock.

by ooda_loop - 19 days ago
Auckland New Zealand
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 522

He's a senior still playing at an upper GM level, I would hate to see him retire just because he is not particularly competitive against the top 100 or so in the world anymore.

by kraska - 19 days ago
Estonia
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 3

Frowneveryone is having his bads days

by mistermax - 19 days ago
Washington, DC Canada
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 979

I'd be happy to be playing at a 2600+ FIDE level.  Its no shame for Karpov - he should play as long as he wants to.

by ErrantDeeds - 19 days ago
Wiltshire England
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 413

I have to say, I don't approve of calls for Karpov to retire. Sure, he may not be able to compete with the best, but if he wants to compete, let him. I would have thought we could afford one of the greatest players in history a bit more respect.

« Previous | 1 2 3 4 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.