Criticism
Submitted by
alexholowczak on Thu, 09/03/2009 at 2:54pm.
This criticism has come the way of the group:
"I must also say that most of the critism about us having a HQ in the first place came from members of the 'Alter England' group. This seems strange to me, as two of their admins alexholowczak and blackfirestorm666 are admins of the following group: County Championship Council here is the groups description: ''The group for the Administrators to discuss Adminstrative issues regarding the Chess County Championship. This is purely for English counties. '' So yes, here are the two leaders of a group criticising us for having a HQ, when in actually fact they are both super admins of a group 'only for admins' of the county teams? is anyone accusing either of THEM of secrecy or keeping members in the dark? Indeed blackfirestorm is actually a member of 7 other 'admin only' groups if you check her profile. Ahem, members might start to see now, why we at Team England admin were a little 'irritated' by the fact that we were receiving criticism for having a HQ by a group run by these individuals? hypocrisy in its most blatant form i would say?"
Firstly, one member from each county is in here. Rather than being a subset of a county like the England HQ, this is in fact more like the World League HQ, where all admins come together.
However, this group has more than that. I've actually let in more than just administrators. Anyone who has wanted to be here has been let in. This is perhaps contrary to the group description, but that can be changed.
Anyway, if you want to invite all of the members into here, then do so. If they're a member of the County Championship, then I have precisely zero objection to them applying to join. So by all means, post a link in the notes of your relevant county. I can't do that for all of you, because they're largely all private. I can't invite several hundred people either (daily limit, time). So it's up to you. I will be inviting the Worcestershire team to join.
| 121 reads | 6 comments |
0 votes: