Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Kramnik Leads Dortmund

  • SonofPearl
  • on Sat, 7/11/2009 2:03am.

Much has been written about Vladimir Kramnik's solid style of play - often less than complementary, but if the former World Champion smells blood, he can be a ruthless attacker when the opportunity presents itself.

After all games in round 6 and 7 in Dortmund ended in draws, the clash between Kramnik and leader Carlsen in round 8 produced one the most memorable games of the tournament.

The normally aggressive Norwegian surprisingly chose the solid QGD against Kramnik.  Rather than trying to gradually nurse a slight positional advantage into something more significant, Kramnik sacrificed a pawn with 18. f5!?

With Kramnik in unusually pugnacious mood, Carlsen was forced to defend accurately against the onslaught.  However, one slip with 25...Qc7 proved costly, as Kramnik blew open the position to either win Carlsen's queen or force checkmate.

Dynamic play from Kramnik to take him to the top of the leaderboard, but a really bad day at the office for Carlsen.

In the other games, Dmitry Jakovenko gradually wore down poor Etienne Bacrot in an energy-sapping 81 moves, and Peter Leko failed to make any progress against last placed Arkadij Naiditsch.

Carlsen's orange juice fails to work it's magic against Kramnik (pic from the official site)


The standings after round 8:

Kramnik, Vladimir   RUS   2759 5
Carlsen, Magnus  NOR  2772  
Leko, Peter  HUN  2756  
Jakovenko, Dmitry  RUS  2760  
Bacrot, Etienne  FRA  2721 3
Naiditsch, Arkadij  GER  2697  

 

2503 reads 9 comments
4 votes

Comments


  • 2 years ago

    fitnessptrainer

    In Leko,P (2756) vs. Naiditsch,A (2697) there is much to learn about the pinned Knight on F6 and how Black c pawn and bishop parry that threat. White can push the e pawn and attack the knight but it will not achieve much.

  • 3 years ago

    _valentin_

    Wonderful (and rare) total harmony between the white pieces in the attack (in the Kramnik-Carlsen game)!

    I still haven't conclusively answered to myself the question why black didn't go for 26...Kg8 (or 28...Kg8). In response to those, 27.Nd5 (or 29.Nd5) seems tempting but I don't see a forced finish after 27...e:d5.

    Given that Kramnik proved that after 28...Ke7? 29.Nb5! white wins with force, the only other option for black defense is 28...Kg8 anyway...

  • 3 years ago

    donngerard

    wow! awesome play by Kramnik!!!

  • 3 years ago

    zonalgman92

    Likewise i had to get the board out and work through Carlsen's options to find out how Kramnik forced the mate. And all the time I'm wondering "When is Kramnik gonna use his night that's just sitting on b5 for the coup de grace?"

  • 3 years ago

    qixel

    Well, I know that I play chess better when I'm slightly drunk. 

    So maybe next time Magnus should try to slip a little vodka into that orange juice.Smile

  • 3 years ago

    percivalfox

    Yes he did, but what amount of time after 36.axb4 did he require to work out that he had a losing game (after all, he had a rook instead of a knight on the board). How 'immediately' did he resign? Cool

  • 3 years ago

    Gnappo83

    For percival: he resigned immediately after 36.axb4

  • 3 years ago

    Dutchie22

    What fantastic and dynamic game from Kramnik. It´s not often he plays this attacking. Love it.

  • 3 years ago

    percivalfox

    I wonder for how long Carlsen watched the position before resigning. Coz it took me about 20 minutes and an extra chess board to realize that it was either lose the queen or checkmate for him...

Back to Top

Post your reply: