Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

London Chess Classic Round 3

Submitted by SonofPearl on Thu, 12/10/2009 at 2:40pm.

Vladimir Kramnik (pictured) won his second consecutive game in the London Chess Classic to keep the pressure on leader Magnus Carlsen.

Kramnik beat Luke McShane, who has now lost twice - to Carlsen and Kramnik - after his marathon win against Short in the first round.

Carlsen had chances to win against the lowest rated entrant, David Howell, but failed to take advantage of his opponent's time trouble.

Friday is a rest day, so round four is on Saturday.  With the other games also ending in draws, the standings (3 points for a win, 1 for a draw) now look like this after three of seven rounds:

Carlsen, Magnus  NOR  2801 7
Kramnik, Vladimir  RUS  2772 6
McShane, Luke J  ENG  2615 3
Nakamura, Hikaru  USA  2715 3
Adams, Michael  ENG  2698 3
Howell, David W L  ENG  2597 3
Ni, Hua  CHN  2665 2
Short, Nigel D  ENG  2707 2


Kramnik inflicts more misery on McShane

kramnik_mcshane_London2009.jpg

 

Howell holds Carlsen to a draw. Both pictures courtesy of John Saunders at the excellent official site.

carlsen_howell_London2009.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by magnus_carlsen_1990 - 2 years ago
Jurong Singapore
Member Since: Dec 2009
Member Points: 81

carlsen and kramnik dominate this turney they shud hav a more even line up

by bigmac26 - 2 years ago
london England
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 278

It'a a point for a draw, three for a win, schubomb. duh... like football, or probably soccer to you

by SchuBomb - 2 years ago
Adelaide Australia
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 3362

@ Nelu_Jr - what are you on? He got the half point.

by Nelu_Jr - 2 years ago
Bucale Romania
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 58

So, after reading everyone's lines, I can say I have spotted a fault!

 @manymercsmike

"I have to give some large amount of credit to David Howell for securing a half point here. "

He got a full point! IMBA!

by jeonjihyun - 2 years ago
seoul South Korea
Member Since: Oct 2009
Member Points: 50

go howell

you have our support

by Tricklev - 2 years ago
Sweden
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 2191

I followed the games live yesterday and I logged off after Kramnik won (made it look impressively easi I might ad) and Carlsen won the exchange. Imagine my surprise logging in today only to find the Carlsen game a draw.

by TomMac19 - 2 years ago
Devon United Kingdom
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 188

p.s. I also must go back on what i have said about Kramnik. He is now playing exciting games with black and not just looking for draws. Also, a very nice guy!

by TomMac19 - 2 years ago
Devon United Kingdom
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 188

in the commentry room, we thought it was all over as there was a mate pattern, but he missed it. As i said, he was clearly very angry over it! Howells Knight was causing him all sorts of problems and not letting him take advantage of his 2 rooks. However, David did miss a knight fork at one stage in the endgame (under serious time trouble again). i think it worked out that he had to move a piece every 20 seconds during the game.

by jemptymethod - 2 years ago
Norcross, GA United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 1433

As for Howell's c3 Siclian, against Black's ...Nf6 & ...e6 setup I prefer 6. Na3 as in a recent game of mine on queenalice.  Then after 6...a6  7. Nc4 Nbd7  8. Ne3 Qc6  9. a4 there are only two games on chess.com (or chesslive.de for that matter), in both of which Black wisely played 9...b6.  My opponent instead played 9...0-0?! allowing me to attain a queenside bind with 10. a5.  I've not been happy as White with the lines with dxc5/...Qxd1 and am surprised Carlsen could only draw, he definitely seemed to have an edge in the middlegame.

by TomMac19 - 2 years ago
Devon United Kingdom
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 188

DjHeikle, Adams was not in time trouble at all, at move 30 he still had 25mins or so i believe.

I went to the gamess yesterday and what a joy it was! Carlsen was obviously gutted and really angry with himself for missing the mating combination, but still had time to give me his autograph...then i was waiting for the lift and stepped in, who else but him, his dad and sister all stepped in too! i managed to get all the players autographs- apart from Short- who i must say, although appears to be nice and okay on the interviews, is actually quite rude in person!

by DJHeilke - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 107

RobKing, Good catch on Carlsen's play.  Estragon, I don't think it was complacency, but maybe he feared [after Robking's line] 56. Kd5 Rxf5+ 57. Ke6?! threatening the f5 rook and also Rh8#.  The refutation is just 57. .... Re5+, but maybe Magnus thought he was giving the white king too much action...

by Estragon - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 4351

Nice catch on the win for Carlsen, robking!  He might also have gone after the b5 pawn earlier - 42 ... Ra5, and if 43 Rd5 Rc3 intending Rb3, or 43 Nd4 Rc3 and the e3 pawn needs help.

I think Carlsen fell to a typical OTB failing:  once achieving a won game and the opponent, in time trouble, plays on to make the control, one often gets complacent, assuming he will soon resign, failing to choose the most direct routes to victory and ending up with only a draw.  It happens more often at lower levels, but it seems no one is immune.

It's a blow to Carlsen, but he is still in the driver's seat since Kramnik has the loss and they don't play again.  Off day tomorrow, then Saturday Carlsen has White against Nakamura, who hasn't shown himself to be particularly sharp in this event.  Carlsen has some extra incentive to avenge his loss in their recent blitz match, but Kasparov is unlikely to be much help preparing for this game. 

by pawnkeeper - 2 years ago
Los Angeles United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 1012
Carlsen had a win after 52. Nf5?? with 52. ... Ra2+ 53. Kg3 Rg1+ 54. Kf4 Rf2+ 55. Kxe4 Rxg4+ winning the Knight and being up a full Rook.
Thats very good! Even the great ones make mistakes.
by ruizleiva - 2 years ago
Pto Montt Chile
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 32

i dont understand the game of sr luke mcshane, was very bad...

by chessoholicalien - 2 years ago
Missouri United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 1156

Nice to see some of the world's best players are using cheap clocks and pens and paper. No Monrois there...

by ASpieboy - 2 years ago
ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha Canada
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 1726

Howell has one nasty face in that picture.

by freeze_ - 2 years ago
Sweden
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 79

If im not mistaken, Carlsen had 10-15 mins left when the draw was agreed.
Howell was in time trouble

by nerv - 2 years ago
Czech Republic
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 129

Yes, after 52.Nf5?? it was easy to win. In fact already 51. Kg2? was a big mistake. Maybe they hadn't enought time...

by begemoth - 2 years ago
MIlton Keynes United Kingdom
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 97

I was there! And I got Kramnik's autograph.

I must say the Howell-Carlsen game was the best of the round.

While Kramnik won relatively easy, both Carlsen and Howell fought hard, first one - for the win, the second - for a draw.

by WGM Natalia_Pogonina - 2 years ago
Saratov Russia
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 2236

Go Vlad! Smile

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.