^ Click here to remove ads! ^

Positional vs. Tactical Players - New Vote Chess Game

Submitted by erik on Wed, 05/14/2008 at 9:09am.

A new Chess.com Vote Chess game starts today - Positional vs. Tactical players! Who will win this battle of styles? Can tactical players land a knockout blow, or will they punch themselves out and get squeezed? Can positional players choke out the position, or will their passivity cost them the game?!

Come find out!

http://www.chess.com/votechess/game.html?id=7034547 


» posted in Misc
 

Comments:

by TestofTime - 2 months ago
mobay Jamaica
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 1

Positions can be broadly categorised as  "open", ie full of open lines and piece play as opposed to "closed", eg blocked and full of manoevering. In open positions, tactics can dominate completely, and the value of formulating positional plans is less because it is very important simply to calculate all the necessary variations to stay alive!

The positional player protagonist could argue that they play positional openings and stay well clear of tactical complications. However what if the opponent influenced the game tactically by playing gambits, etc ? The positional player needs to be tactically aware even if they do build their own infrastructure in terms of openings for example, for supporting their playing style.

 

See this article. It is interesting

http://www.chesscorner.com/tutorial/Intermediate/adtactics/ability.htm


by erik - 2 months ago
Mountain View, CA United States
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 5413
petrosian was a positional player. morphy was a tactical player. kasparov is more tactical. it is about STYLE, not about ability :)
by Staples - 2 months ago
Chetwynd Canada
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 1
I think that most chess players aren't either tactical or positional - it takes both to win. Although some players could, of course, focus on just one or the other.
by SIXGUNS - 2 months ago
Memphis United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 69

I believe Fischer's demolition of Tigran Petrosian on his way to snatching the World Title from Spassky may have already answered that question. Being that Tigran Petrosian would have to rank somewhere in the top three greatest  positional players of ALL time, possibly even number one!!!!

We all know what Fischer did to him.Laughing--SIX


by Masky - 2 months ago
Montreal Canada
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 80
i started playing positional but still lose a lot of games... takes time...
by GotGoose - 2 months ago
Indiana United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 179
Are not both skills needed to win a game?
by tannguye1 - 2 months ago
Iowa United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 19

It's hard for me trying to figure out what I am, people say I'm tactical but that only comes from a strong positon lol.

Is there a test I can take or something?


by Gert-Jan - 2 months ago
Groningen Netherlands
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 192

when are you a tactical or a positional player??

is there somebody who can give exaples or something?

 


by 123karpov - 2 months ago
CALIFORNIA United States
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 30
you need much power to win in chess..chess is like thinking and analyzing or reading the game,,not just smart!
by benws - 2 months ago
United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1073
somewhat hard to pick a side...i know some people like me are a combination of both tactical and postional. after all, you usuallly need both to win a game.
 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.