Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Rybka Wins In Leiden

  • SonofPearl
  • on 11/30/10 11:45 AM.

Some computer chess tournaments aim to determine the best chess program by running all the engines on the same hardware to create a level playing field.

The Open Dutch Computer Championships in Leiden, now in its 30th year, dispenses with such limitations for a no-holds barred smack-down between the top engines.

The most jaw-dropping hardware this year was the mind blowing 800 cores monster powering Jonny.

Twenty 'players' competed in a nine round Swiss competition and the winner was top seed Rybka with a near perfect 8.5/9 score, way ahead of the rest.  Only Spark escaped with a draw against the 'little fish'.

Since Rybka was created by IM Vasik Rajlich (pictured), it has dominated the computer chess world and become the engine that sets the standard for others to beat.

The Rybka 4 engine is available in both Aquarium and Chessbase GUIs.

Some of Rybka's games can be found below.

The final standings:

1  Rybka  Lukas Cimiotti cluster, 248 Intel Nehalem cores, 2.93 Ghz and up 8.5
2  Spike  AMD Phenom X6, 6x2.8 GHz, 4GB RAM 6.0

 Deep Sjeng  Cluster 32x8 AMD Opteron, 2.4 GHz (256 cores) 6.0

 Hiarcs  12 Intel cores, 3.33 GHz 6.0
5  Spark  Quad Core I7 2.6 Ghz 5.5

 Deep Shredder  12 core Intel Nehalem cluster 5.5
7  Jonny  Cluster 800 Cores Intel I7 , 2.2 Ghz 5.0

 The Baron  Dual Intel Xeon W5580 5.0

 The King  Intel Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 1 core in use 5.0
10  Scaramanga  Core I5, 1 core in use 4.5

 Nightmare  Core i7 980X, 6 cores on 3600 MHz 4.5

 Rookie  6 Core AMD Phenom2 3.7 GHz 4.5

 RedQueen  Intel I7-720QM 2.8 GHz / 4 Cores / 4 GB RAM, 1 core in use 4.5
14  Hermann  Core i7 860, 8GB RAM, Windows 7 using 4 cores 4.0

 GoldBar  Core I7, 4 cores on 3600 MHz 4.0
16  Kallisto  Intel CoreDuo 1.8 GHz, 1 core in use 3.5
17  Joker  Intel Core2Duo 4 Ghz, 1 core in use 3.0
18  Hansdamf  K8-x2 2.5
19  Fridolin  Quad-Core (4 cores in use) 1.5
20  Dolphin  E8600 Intel Core Duo 4 Ghz, 1 core in use 1.0

 

 

 

 

 

7657 reads 62 comments
4 votes

Comments


  • 2 years ago

    TacticsSmactics

    Why no Crafty?  I love me some crafty.

  • 2 years ago

    JoseO

    It would be interesting if Fritz was there. I do not think it would have done well against Rbyka. It really does not matter since Fritz will probably beat the vast majority of humans playing against it unless a human decides to "reprogram the simulation" like James T. Kirk did.

    I wonder if Crafty is updated anymore. It would be nice to see some of my favorites programs play against each other. 

    Myself I play against Shredder on my iPhone. I like that fact that it has a setting where it plays at my level so that I have a fair chance of winning as long as I concentrate.

  • 2 years ago

    goutham32kog

    go rybka :)

  • 2 years ago

    herbanmusic

    @ Thats the point... Vasil doesnt show proof that those engines he calls clones are real clones...and proof?!? Check your sources first mate...  Try to know enouh first about an issue and then come out talking !!

    Anyway: I can see youre one of those people that has to see to believe.

    Fair play t you= Just give thanks to your eyesight then, cuz if you ever go blind you wont believe anything !!

    Rasssspect !!

  • 2 years ago

    muralidharancg

    TECH GREATNESS,LONG LIVE CHESS

  • 2 years ago

    e4a6d4b5

    hi everybody,

    its nice this tournament but we think rybka must play whit  Computer4-imposibil from www.chess.com . bye bye

  • 2 years ago

    musiclife

    My god, that is a sick combination in Johnny vs Rybka. 

  • 2 years ago

    dave_9990

    @SaintPedronik; post fixed, edit listed below.

    edit: my mistake I wrote this late at night. Computers are estimated to get ~+70 Elo per doubling of speed, and less Elo per doubling of processors (i.e. 2x CPU's is not equivalent to 2x speed).

  • 2 years ago

    SaintPedronik

    dave, actually, engines would NOT gain 70 points for every doubled processors. Think about it. Rybka is running on one core, 70 more point for two core, then 70 more for 4, 70 for 8 etc. And by the time Rybka hits core 200+, it is beyond invincible...That just doesn't seem right. :)

  • 2 years ago

    Frezco

    I console myself by saying...

    Computers cheat!  They consult all their books during the game, and they don't play touch-move!

  • 2 years ago

    Alvin-Forteta

    Rybka vs Houdini

    Smackdown 1-on-1 on the same hardware.

  • 2 years ago

    Alvin-Forteta

    Rybka vs Houdini

  • 2 years ago

    veclock

    They should run it on the same computer. Now it's not only a competition between engines, but also between hardware.

  • 2 years ago

    markronilodevera

    the king is the chessmaster and it perf0rms well despite the fact that they just used the king in a c0re2du0 

  • 2 years ago

    Deranged

    I knew rybka was the best.

  • 2 years ago

    leo5

    Computer chess sucks

  • 2 years ago

    dean_sam

    as i know chessmaster won rybka last year

  • 2 years ago

    dean_sam

    where is chessmaster???

    or chessmaster is the king?

    anybody know?

  • 2 years ago

    dave_9990

    I think the engines would be above 3400 elo on quad core's. I think I read somewhere that they get an increase of >< 70 elo every time they double the number of cores, and more if they double the processing speed.

    edit: my mistake I wrote this late at night. Computers get +70 elo per doubling of speed, and less Elo per doubling of processors (i.e. 2x CPU's is not equivalent to 2x speed).

  • 2 years ago

    Ckhaan

    LuL. @bulletchess4fun hit the right spot.

    Respect to > herbanmusic for being such a nice example in this topic.

Back to Top

Post your reply: